Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org
 designates 216.119.133.2 as permitted sender)
Reply-To: <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
To: <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: 
 <CAO+9X+V5vbDMnjyBrYnei6L=c3Ui3q0-2zDw8tjuFPDFfi53uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1332132677.68334.YahooMailClassic@web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <CANQgRaZ3tDfm=Y-FgQO0FvYaZJ_hpiT-Fepy-gH55kRBy6RYfg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANQgRaZ3tDfm=Y-FgQO0FvYaZJ_hpiT-Fepy-gH55kRBy6RYfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: IP clearance issues ( was Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As
 of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19))
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:55:28 -0700
Organization: NuovoDoc
Message-ID: <00a401cd05f1$16fda030$44f8e090$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQJn3NQj/y91ZmuZONQ2P9G67rMHdQKOi7vhAYHDKjuVG6T+YA==
Content-Language: en-us

There is a tool, RAT, that is used to check SVN for license headers.

I believe that is being worked through.

Meanwhile, I want to correct what might be a misunderstanding.

It is the PPMC responsibility to *demonstrate* to the IPMC that IP =
clearance has been accomplished and in a way that can be =
inspected/verified/audited.  It is not the IPMC's job to find IP =
clearance issues for us.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Shenfeng Liu [mailto:liushenf@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 23:30
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; pfg@apache.org
Subject: Re: IP clearance issues ( was Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status =
Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19))

Pedro,
  You can see from the test plan
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan , =
that
the IP clearance testing that Lily performed is functional verification
test for those areas impacted by the IP clearance work. I think the code
scan work should be done by developer, but not Lily as a tester.
  While I'm also curious to know if any tool can be used to help us to =
do
the IP scan...

- Simon


2012/3/19 Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>

> Hello;
>
> Despite its evident value, I think I find this
> QA testing report somewhat misguiding ...
> 100% IP clearance testing didnt find:
>
> ooo_custom_images/industrial/README
>
> and despite the website suggesting otherwise,
> the tango binaries have embedded GPL notices.
>
> We need some real testing on this!
>
> Pedro.
>
> BTW. The rat-excludes file is still very populated.
>
> --- Dom 18/3/12, xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
> > *Based on the test plan:
> > =
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan,
> > I can
> > say that the planned work are 100% done.
> > 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the
> > tests of areas most
> > impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
> > 100% general testing have been done. These are general
> > functional tests.
> >
> > *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 -
> > 2012/3/12):
> > *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev.
> > r1299571<
> =
http://people.apache.org/%7Eorw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_W=
in_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe<htt=
p://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x8=
6_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe>
> >
> > Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04,
> > Redhat 6.1,
> > Windows 7 SP1
> > Test Cases Executed:
> > IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking
> > General testing:
> > Math formula
> > Some Base functions
> > *Interoperability automaiton testing:*
> > Tested total 1188 files with following file types:
> >
> =
(odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(=
odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot)
> >
> > The test scenarios cover:
> >
> >    - Load
> >    - Save
> >    - Reopen
> >
> > Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4
> > minutes) to
> > open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading.
> > OpenOffice.org
> > 3.3 has the same problem.  It's very quick using MS
> > Office. Bug i119091 was
> > raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known
> > issue.
> >
> > *Defects Summary*:
> > So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and
> > 3.4m0. If we count
> > the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about
> > date we call
> > "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271.
> > Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17
> > ones remain
> > opening now.
> > One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release
> > blockers and
> > two of them need be discussed:
> >   D<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dbug_id&query_based_on=3DAll340ReleaseBloc=
ker
> >
> > Sev=E2=96=B2<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dbug_severity%20DESC%2Cpriority%2C&query_b=
ased_on=3DAll340ReleaseBlocker
> >
> > Pri=E2=96=B2<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dpriority%20DESC%2Cbug_severity&query_base=
d_on=3DAll340ReleaseBlocker
> >
> > OS<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dop_sys%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_ba=
sed_on=3DAll340ReleaseBlocker
> >
> > Assignee<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dassigned_to%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&que=
ry_based_on=3DAll340ReleaseBlocker
> >
> > Status<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dbug_status%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&quer=
y_based_on=3DAll340ReleaseBlocker
> >
> > Resolution<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dresolution%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&quer=
y_based_on=3DAll340ReleaseBlocker
> >
> > Summary<
> =
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DUNCONFIRMED&bug_st=
atus=3DCONFIRMED&bug_status=3DACCEPTED&bug_status=3DREOPENED&field0-0-0=3D=
flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=3Dflagtypes.name&field0-0-2=3Dbug_severity&quer=
y_format=3Dadvanced&type0-0-0=3Dequals&type0-0-1=3Dequals&type0-0-2=3Dequ=
als&value0-0-0=3D3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3D3.4_release_blocker%=
3F&value0-0-2=3Dblocker&order=3Dshort_desc%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&quer=
y_based_on=3DAll340ReleaseBlocker
> >
> > 118895 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D118895>
> > cri  P3  All
> > jsc@apache.org
> > CONF  ---  aoo3.4 r1240836: some contextmenu
> > entries are
> > not localized =
<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D118895>
> > 119082 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119082>
> > cri  P3  All
> > ooo-issues@incubator.apache...
> > CONF  ---  hidden section - crash when
> > pressing F9 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119082>
> > 119090<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119090>
> > nor
> >  P3  All  issues@security.openoffice.org
> > CONF  ---  Default Encryption
> > Fails for Down-Level Implementations
> > <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119090>
> > 3 bugs found.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 24 defects raised in this week,and 14 defects closed.
> >
> > Based on previous testing and my daily usage on AOO 3.4, so
> > far we can say
> > that:
> > The stability is ok.
> > The interoperability with MS Office seems fine.
> > The basic functions work fine.
> >
> > But the accessibility, globalizaiton may have some problems.
> > The general
> > testing in community focus on installability, basic
> > fucntions,
> > interoperability, extension etc.
> >
> > *Risk:
> > *The high risk for AOO 3.4 is during the migration from OO
> > to AOO, many
> > test cases lost and no one large automation suite can be
> > used for
> > regression testing now. So again I appreciate and thakns for
> > everyone's
> > contribution to QA works.
> > If you have interesting in QA work and decide to contribute
> > to it, please
> > go to AOO 3.4 main page: =
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA.
> > Get dev build from:
> >
> =
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+D=
eveloper+Snapshots
> > Write your case by edit this page:
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/
> > And place your result:
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults
> > Or you may just do general testing based on your usage
> > without test cases
> > or testing result and just raise defects in Bugzilla
> > directly:
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
> > Any contribution is welcome and can contribute to this
> > project's success!
> >
> > Besides, I created entry for project reporting on below
> > wiki:
> > =
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting
> >
> > Uner it, you can get detail AOO 3.4 QA weekly status reports
> > from this page:
> >
> =
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+QA+Status+Re=
port
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Lily
> >
>