incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yong Lin Ma <mayo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: IP clearance issues ( was Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19))
Date Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:17:20 GMT
 I think the 100% means 100% test coverage for the IP clean work have
been done by developers.

Cleaning up (need finding out first) of all the license info in code
should be done by some tools.

Not sure whether that will be part of IPMC review.


On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello;
>
> Despite its evident value, I think I find this
> QA testing report somewhat misguiding ...
> 100% IP clearance testing didnt find:
>
> ooo_custom_images/industrial/README
>
> and despite the website suggesting otherwise,
> the tango binaries have embedded GPL notices.
>
> We need some real testing on this!
>
> Pedro.
>
> BTW. The rat-excludes file is still very populated.
>
> --- Dom 18/3/12, xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
>> *Based on the test plan:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan,
>> I can
>> say that the planned work are 100% done.
>> 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the
>> tests of areas most
>> impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
>> 100% general testing have been done. These are general
>> functional tests.
>>
>> *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 -
>> 2012/3/12):
>> *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev.
>> r1299571<http://people.apache.org/%7Eorw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe>
>> Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04,
>> Redhat 6.1,
>> Windows 7 SP1
>> Test Cases Executed:
>> IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking
>> General testing:
>> Math formula
>> Some Base functions
>> *Interoperability automaiton testing:*
>> Tested total 1188 files with following file types:
>> (odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot)
>>
>> The test scenarios cover:
>>
>>    - Load
>>    - Save
>>    - Reopen
>>
>> Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4
>> minutes) to
>> open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading.
>> OpenOffice.org
>> 3.3 has the same problem.  It's very quick using MS
>> Office. Bug i119091 was
>> raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known
>> issue.
>>
>> *Defects Summary*:
>> So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and
>> 3.4m0. If we count
>> the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about
>> date we call
>> "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271.
>> Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17
>> ones remain
>> opening now.
>> One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release
>> blockers and
>> two of them need be discussed:
>>   D<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_id&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Sev▲<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_severity%20DESC%2Cpriority%2C&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Pri▲<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=priority%20DESC%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> OS<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=op_sys%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Assignee<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=assigned_to%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Status<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_status%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Resolution<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=resolution%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Summary<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=short_desc%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> 118895 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895>
>> cri  P3  All
>> jsc@apache.org
>> CONF  ---  aoo3.4 r1240836: some contextmenu
>> entries are
>> not localized <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895>
>> 119082 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082>
>> cri  P3  All
>> ooo-issues@incubator.apache...
>> CONF  ---  hidden section - crash when
>> pressing F9 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082>
>> 119090<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090>
>> nor
>>  P3  All  issues@security.openoffice.org
>> CONF  ---  Default Encryption
>> Fails for Down-Level Implementations
>> <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090>
>> 3 bugs found.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 24 defects raised in this week,and 14 defects closed.
>>
>> Based on previous testing and my daily usage on AOO 3.4, so
>> far we can say
>> that:
>> The stability is ok.
>> The interoperability with MS Office seems fine.
>> The basic functions work fine.
>>
>> But the accessibility, globalizaiton may have some problems.
>> The general
>> testing in community focus on installability, basic
>> fucntions,
>> interoperability, extension etc.
>>
>> *Risk:
>> *The high risk for AOO 3.4 is during the migration from OO
>> to AOO, many
>> test cases lost and no one large automation suite can be
>> used for
>> regression testing now. So again I appreciate and thakns for
>> everyone's
>> contribution to QA works.
>> If you have interesting in QA work and decide to contribute
>> to it, please
>> go to AOO 3.4 main page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA.
>> Get dev build from:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
>> Write your case by edit this page:
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/
>> And place your result:
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults
>> Or you may just do general testing based on your usage
>> without test cases
>> or testing result and just raise defects in Bugzilla
>> directly:
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
>> Any contribution is welcome and can contribute to this
>> project's success!
>>
>> Besides, I created entry for project reporting on below
>> wiki:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting
>>
>> Uner it, you can get detail AOO 3.4 QA weekly status reports
>> from this page:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+QA+Status+Report
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Lily
>>

Mime
View raw message