incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)
Date Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:46:29 GMT
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Maho NAKATA <maho@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Lily and all
>
> Now time to create a new ML, ooo-qa?
> It's very hard to track such info, as you see, traffic of this mailing list
> is very large amount.
>

I agree, traffic is heavy.  Another solution is to create an ooo-rob list ;-)

But seriously, I think our largest separable topic is the discussions
on Pootle and translation process and ongoing discussion of
translating pages on the website.  If we made an ooo-l10n list, this
would get a good amount of traffic.

For example today (March 20th) we had 16 posts on such topics.  This
is a good thing, and there is some overlapping interest, but I think
we scare off some potential contributors if we force them to subscribe
to a list with 60 messages/day.  Of course, those who are interested
in everything are free to subscribe to multiple lists.

-Rob

> Thanks
>  Nakata Maho
>
> From: xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com>
> Subject: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)
> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:38:53 +0800
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
>> *Based on the test plan:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan, I can
>> say that the planned work are 100% done.
>> 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of areas most
>> impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
>> 100% general testing have been done. These are general functional tests.
>>
>> *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 - 2012/3/12):
>> *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev.
>> r1299571<http://people.apache.org/%7Eorw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe>
>> Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04, Redhat 6.1,
>> Windows 7 SP1
>> Test Cases Executed:
>> IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking
>> General testing:
>> Math formula
>> Some Base functions
>> *Interoperability automaiton testing:*
>> Tested total 1188 files with following file types:
>> (odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot)
>>
>> The test scenarios cover:
>>
>>    - Load
>>    - Save
>>    - Reopen
>>
>> Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4 minutes) to
>> open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading. OpenOffice.org
>> 3.3 has the same problem.  It's very quick using MS Office. Bug i119091 was
>> raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known issue.
>>
>> *Defects Summary*:
>> So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and 3.4m0. If we count
>> the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about date we call
>> "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271.
>> Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17 ones remain
>> opening now.
>> One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release blockers and
>> two of them need be discussed:
>>   D<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_id&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Sev▲<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_severity%20DESC%2Cpriority%2C&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Pri▲<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=priority%20DESC%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> OS<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=op_sys%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Assignee<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=assigned_to%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Status<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_status%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Resolution<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=resolution%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> Summary<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=short_desc%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker>
>> 118895 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895>  cri  P3  All
>> jsc@apache.org  CONF  ---  aoo3.4 r1240836: some contextmenu entries are
>> not localized <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895>
>> 119082 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082>  cri  P3  All
>> ooo-issues@incubator.apache...  CONF  ---  hidden section - crash when
>> pressing F9 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082>
>> 119090<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090>  nor
>>  P3  All  issues@security.openoffice.org  CONF  ---  Default Encryption
>> Fails for Down-Level Implementations
>> <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090>  3 bugs found.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 24 defects raised in this week,and 14 defects closed.
>>
>> Based on previous testing and my daily usage on AOO 3.4, so far we can say
>> that:
>> The stability is ok.
>> The interoperability with MS Office seems fine.
>> The basic functions work fine.
>>
>> But the accessibility, globalizaiton may have some problems. The general
>> testing in community focus on installability, basic fucntions,
>> interoperability, extension etc.
>>
>> *Risk:
>> *The high risk for AOO 3.4 is during the migration from OO to AOO, many
>> test cases lost and no one large automation suite can be used for
>> regression testing now. So again I appreciate and thakns for everyone's
>> contribution to QA works.
>> If you have interesting in QA work and decide to contribute to it, please
>> go to AOO 3.4 main page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA.
>> Get dev build from:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
>> Write your case by edit this page:
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/
>> And place your result:
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults
>> Or you may just do general testing based on your usage without test cases
>> or testing result and just raise defects in Bugzilla directly:
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
>> Any contribution is welcome and can contribute to this project's success!
>>
>> Besides, I created entry for project reporting on below wiki:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting
>>
>> Uner it, you can get detail AOO 3.4 QA weekly status reports from this page:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+QA+Status+Report
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Lily

Mime
View raw message