incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From RGB ES <rgb.m...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test)
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:04:15 GMT
Putting everything together, from a non coder point of view: most dev
builds up to now used their own install path and a different user
profile path (at least on Linux), so the problem is not to do that but
IF AOO 3.4 *need* to do that.

Options:

1- Use same install path and same user profile path than 3.3. PROS:
consistent with OOo 3.x behaviour (with x > 1: as someone commented
before, 3.0 did not override 2.4 user profile). CONS: the inevitable
deletion of user installed extensions could left extension related
menu entries that cannot be deleted, with the very negative point that
downgrading to 3.3 will not fix the problem. This have the potential
to provide a negative image to the project: normal users will not
understand what's going on.

2- Use same install path but different user profile path. PROS: if
user downgrade, everything will be as before. CONS: a downgrade could
be needed to finish that urgent work (yes, there are many users that
upgrade in the middle of an important work...)

3- Use a new install path and a new user profile path. PROS: both
programs running safely side by side, giving the user time to migrate
the work slowly and without problems. CONS: disk space?

I prefer option 3, but have no problem if other solutions are used instead.

Regards
Ricardo

Mime
View raw message