incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andre Fischer ...@a-w-f.de>
Subject Re: HEADS UP: install sets were renamed from OOo* to Apache_OpenOffice_incubating*
Date Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:48:22 GMT
On 22.03.2012 21:46, TJ Frazier wrote:
> On 3/22/2012 16:28, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Juergen Schmidt
>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 22. March 2012 at 15:19, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 22.03.2012 13:51, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>>>>> Please note that the install sets that fall out of a build have
>>>>> been renamed
>>>>> from OOo* to Apache_OpenOffice_incubating* so that e.g.
>>>>> OOo_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>> now has the file name
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would prefer a shorter AOO_incubating_3.4.0_...
>>> I used for example a scheme like aoo-3.4-incubating-src... for our
>>> source release. Similar to for example the odftoolkit (incubating)
>>> project.
>>> Why expanding OOo to Apache_OpenOffice_? Ok it seems we have to
>>> include "incubating" but that's it.
>>>
>>
>> It looks like the recommendation is to use the full product name, but
>> the "Apache" part is optional for podlings.
>>
>> So "openoffice-3.4.0-incubating" would be one possible root.
>>
>> See: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#naming
>
> Has anybody checked to see if we'll run into that idiotic 72-character
> limitation on path names?

Can you explain where there this a 72-character limitation ?

-Andre

>
> /tj/
>>
>>> Just my 2 cents
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>>>
>>>> and another heads up ;-)
>>>>
>>>> The next developer snapshots, proposed by J├╝rgen, will _not_ contain
>>>> this change.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message