incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <>
Subject Re: Competition (was: Clarifying facts)
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:29:32 GMT
On 03/13/12 18:00, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> ...
>> On 03/13/12 17:36, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>>     At Apache we aren't in competition with other projects,
>>>>>     we provide our work for the public benefit and leave
>>>>>     discretion about adoption to the public.  Please keep
>>>>>     that in mind, and stick to providing resources that
>>>>>     benefit general members of the public.
>> In general I am OK with that, but I think here we talk with the code:
>> Other projects can take our code and integrate it with their project
>> and we like and encourage that but that doesn't mean we are going
>> to recommend their project in our webpages or wikis.
>> Do you really think we are doing all this hard work to put together
>> a release to recommend people to download something else?
> Well the thing is, right now the situation is that you haven't released.
> What you tell people to do between now and then will change as the facts
> change, but informing users about alternatives is actually a way to gain
> their respect, and playing silly games to hide those alternatives under
> the guise that the truth needs to be colored somehow does a disservice
> to your users, and to the reputation of this project as a providing a
> public vendor-neutral resource.

No, It's really very simple: we have developer snapshots and we
want people to test them. At this precise time we need testers and
people reporting bugs in the release. Bug reports from someone
running LibreOffice are not useful to us.

No silly games were played, unless you mean the line about trying
LO as an interim solution (by Simon). I personally think such a
suggestion is rather offensive with the developers that have been
putting a huge effort for this release.

>> Sure I love the idea of having a great family playing under the same
>> umbrella but realistically that is not happening and if people want
>> to work with us the best place to do it is here.
> Well you still have some harder collective choices to make regarding
> interoperability once you start gearing up for a 4.0 release that
> may provide an upgrade path for 3.4 users but will diverge from
> the plans of the LibreOffice team.  Having an open communication
> channel will benefit both communities as well as the entire user
> base of both products, don't you think?

This discussion has nothing to do with interoperability. We can
be different and each project will support their own releases
looking at the other over the shoulder and still interoperate.

This said and this is only IMHO: I think we can forget about
interoperability beyond the standard ODF. In at least a case
I am aware of, LO is breaking the extensions API and has
no interest to share the changes.

I think eventually both projects will diverge completely but I
don't think that is so bad: I think we want both projects to
be extremely cool in different ways.


(And now I am going back to coding... :) )

View raw message