incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution
Date Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:34:21 GMT
Please lets leave that sort of issue
to infrastructure to worry about- what
we do about mirrors that cannot support
the AOO bandwidth needs is not a concern
for AOO itself.




>________________________________
> From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
>To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> 
>Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:31 PM
>Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution
> 
>
>--- Mer 21/3/12, Joe Schaefer ha scritto:
>...
>> Right now the ASF has roughly 250
>> mirrors,
>> of which atm I'd expect 50 or so to drop us if
>> we start carrying AOO releases.  That means
>> we'd have about twice as many mirrors as
>> the mirrorbrain OOo service has, so we should
>> be in better shape overall than what happened
>> in the past, assuming we do something smart
>> about staggering the Update service.  There
>> will be no way to surprise anybody about the
>> release timing for an AOO release as at least
>> a week of public discussion/voting will precede it.
>> 
>> 
>
>FWIW, I am pretty sure the problem will be
>windows binaries: if we did a source-only
>release we probably wouldn't lose any mirrors.
>
>Perhaps there is some way to make the binary
>packages opt-out for the mirrors?
>
>Pedro.
>
>> 
>> I still would like to strongly suggest that
>> someone on the PPMC step up NOW and offer to contact
>> existing mirror operators to get them to cover
>> some of our losses.
>> 
>
>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message