Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4F450863.9010009@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:23:15 -0500
From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:10.0) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does anyone build AOO under *csh?
References: <1329845826.55962.YahooMailClassic@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1329845826.55962.YahooMailClassic@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/21/12 12:37, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> --- Mar 21/2/12, Herbert Duerr<hdu@apache.org>  ha scritto:
> ...
>
>> Ah yes, thanks. Reworking the build process to work on all
>> shells is a goal I don't want to attack though; doing that
>> may be an idea for volunteers who enjoy getting intimate
>> knowledge of the challenges and problems of the build
>> process in a huge multi-platform project.
>>
>> I'd just like to get rid of the script that gets built for
>> *csh out of the way, as it is in the source root and being
>> named similar to its counterpart leads to confusion IMHO.
>>
> Ugh.. is there a hurry for this? leaving us to bash's
> mercy seems unavoidable but not necessarily a feature
> I want to see in 3.4.
>
> I will test the tcsh stuff to see if it works at all.
>
Bah.. I just tried again and it works fine !

Pedro.