Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE30E9E24 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8104 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 07:45:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7731 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 07:45:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7609 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2012 07:45:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:45:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:45:02 +0000 Received: by werc1 with SMTP id c1so1767770wer.6 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:44:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nr6xjxeiOOIHVw3jgZUeKauZox7r16WIkpNl6y5H0GY=; b=ncS4HnWNumZ3eOX+q7r67r6EDWBNME5g846zdlXVCUYRxIzMBqnUXg2vQaQjyL28dR V57QwG8WTuL9kpUCSMTB3OlrOFLjpV2nm5xO3C7U7ilQ751S4Q9MaykzfifpMxtvuLVH LWW2EUj/p50bdNJXepeNWPoEZ2kRIWl6z10xA= Received: by 10.180.101.72 with SMTP id fe8mr1708808wib.4.1329464682666; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:44:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [9.155.131.21] (deibp9eh1--blueice3n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cs4sm31462235wib.8.2012.02.16.23.44.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:44:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F3E0568.7050000@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:44:40 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2htaWR0?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Hanging implementation of secant functions References: <4F3BB35E.5080204@t-online.de> <4F3D7753.3060502@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <4F3D7753.3060502@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/16/12 10:38 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Armin, > > Armin Le Grand schrieb: >> Hi Regina, >> >> On 15.02.2012 14:30, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> with https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117312 and >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=111413 the implementation >>> of the functions SEC, CSC, SECH and CSCH was planed. Patch is attached >>> there. Because of the transition it hangs now. How to proceed? >> >> To avoid misinterpretations: Is this fully implemented and checked or >> work in progress? Can it be comitted 'as-is'? > > It is implemented in LibreOffice in 3.4.5 and 3.5. Eike has made the > following changes: > In file formula/inc/formula/compiler.hrc he uses the numbers 98, 99, > 100, 101 and shifts the following numbers accordingly, where I had used > the numbers 395, 396, 397, 398. > The file scfuncs.hrc is not used in LO and can not be used in AOO too, > because the way helpids are handled has changed in the meantime. > Therefore Eike has made the necessary changes in file /sc/inc/helpids.h > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9dd0e2aabcddcac3dc961933b7bed8d612a43e58 > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1e3e411b54b2d556ee1df8b903d8ff311419dc99 > > (You find the relevant commits there with search for SECH in log msg) > > The other changes in LO are the same as in my patches, which are > attached to the issue. > > So how to proceed? Copy the changes of file "helpids.h"? Change the > numbers or stick with my numbers? Generate a new patch? > The easiest way is to ensure or ask Eike if he is willing to provide his changes under ALv2. Otherwise the changes are very straight forward and probably the only way to do it. At least the changes in the helpids.h. I am not sure about the id change in the c...compiler.hrc. I think the id's have to be unique and if it works with your id's we can used it. It is your choice of course but maybe when you think about future improvements you should consider to do it first in AOO. It will make our life easier because of the one way license/code flow ;-) Juergen