Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D179908A for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4764 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 10:43:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 4367 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 10:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 4342 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2012 10:43:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:43:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:43:11 +0000 Received: by bkwq11 with SMTP id q11so1515549bkw.6 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:42:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZXgVmV/3aGgtx5t9eiJOoE82yINs2osOMTxWrm68OMg=; b=oBZ+atfKMdhrJtR/wTucS+s5XGFbqXB6RxW7X3Ekus1zWgM4EvuiwbUjRyE5aYf/RF 0jjL2xr8jx2rJATQqumJJDVxe95wiw3cOZ+stgfIVlK7Vt/mGBe+goI7ulCvgkCeJl6w Q4Xq3EpSIZh8efjfImzkUUMKLgD/qAQW3ogS0= Received: by 10.204.145.82 with SMTP id c18mr2178782bkv.121.1328870570945; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [9.155.131.21] (deibp9eh1--blueice3n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ey8sm16458058bkb.1.2012.02.10.02.42.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:42:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F34F4A9.6060808@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:42:49 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fieldmaster References: <201202081951.q18Jp9Md065588@cms.zones.apache.org> <1328732532.19584.YahooMailNeo@web160904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1328754174.29296.YahooMailNeo@web160905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4F337CAA.2000001@googlemail.com> <016a01cce765$4bdd28c0$e3977a40$@acm.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/9/12 11:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi Dennis, >> >> Kay recently updated this page: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/website-local.html >> >> Does this provide any illumination for you? >> >> AFAIK - api is a special case and was discussed in the past. I'll find the >> thread if needed. >> > > ditto on this from me...I'm perfectly happy editing areas as long as I'm > convinced I'll "do no harm". api specs...maybe not. in the api section of the web site the following area is automatically generated as part of the SDK build process. api/docs/common/ref/... [1] api/docs/cpp/ref/... [2] api/docs/java/ref/... [3] [1] the IDL reference documentation [2] the C++ UNO runtime reference [3] the Java UNO runtime reference These section gets always updated after a new release. It's the same documentation that is also part of the SDK I hope that make it a little bit more clear Juergen > > >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> >>> I am not clear what is what would be called the maintainable source in >> the case of the ooo-site. >>> >>> It is useful to know that some of the pages are generated automatically >> as byproducts of other processes (such as an IDL processor/generator) and >> are not the maintainable source. >>> >>> I wonder if there are places in the ooo-site publication staging- and >> tool-chain where one also must be careful not to patch downstream from the >> preferred source. >>> >>> Knowing there are other steps needed beyond committing working-copy >> changes to the ooo-site SVN is more mystery meat. The only way I have seen >> for triggering publishing of the site is on the CMS browser interface. I >> have no idea if that is the place for performing the missing step. >>> >>> - Dennis >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: J�rgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischmidt@googlemail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 23:59 >>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fieldmaster >>> >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> >>> On 2/9/12 3:22 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>>> Well no, but the beauty of svn is that you only need >>>> to deal with the section of the tree you are interested >>>> in. So don't check-out all of ooo-site just to apply this >>>> tiny patch- look at the patch to see which directory >>>> it applies to and just check-out THAT. >>>> >>>> >>>> Applying the patch is a matter of cd'ing to that >>>> directory and running >>>> >>>> % patch< path/to/email/msg.txt >>>> % svn commit -m 'apply fieldmaster patch' >>>> >>> >>> I hope you can give me a hint what I am missing... >>> >>> >>> I checked out >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/api >>> some time ago and made some changes for example in the index.html (e.g. >>> removed the project lead names) >>> >>> I checked the content locally and check in the index.html. But when I >>> browse the API site my changes are not yet visible there. >>> >>> Which step is missing? >>> >>> Juergen >>> >>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Rob Weir >>>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 9:17 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fieldmaster >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Joe Schaefer >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> No idea if this is sufficient Ric, but I used the CMS >>>>>> to email this patch as I explained earlier. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cool. But unless we have more committers download ooo-site and set up >>>>> an off-line site build environment, these patches are going to be slow >>>>> to integrate. I'm guilty as well. I'll find some time to get this >>>>> set up on my machine. >>>>> >>>>> Or is there any easier way to suck these patches into the CMS? For >>>>> example, it would be really cool if there was an "upload/apply patch" >>>>> button in the CMS "edit" view. That would enable any committer to >>>>> review and apply site patches, even the ones not comfortable with SVN >>>>> and command-line tools. >>>>> >>>>> -Rob >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer >>>>>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>> Cc: >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 1969 7:00 PM >>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] fieldmaster >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's the patch for Ric's issue. >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >