Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:36:32 +0000
From: Rory O'Farrell <ofarrwrk@iol.ie>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: preparation for our first release
Message-Id: <20120224123632.14fa1c9dbff832f6cfbaa1e5@iol.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4F478286.2010004@googlemail.com>
References: <4F47651C.7070902@googlemail.com>
	<4F477696.4070202@bluewin.ch>
	<4F478286.2010004@googlemail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:28:54 +0100
J=FCrgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Raphael, you should keep in mind that we had a 3.4 beta already
> last year. We have removed things or have replaced things. And
> for both do we have tested it since weeks. If we figure further
> critical issues than we will fix it and will potentially move
> the date.

Sorry - last posting escaped!

I'd be happier if the proposed release was 3.4 Beta 2, even if
that progressed to RC1 within a short period.  To proceed from
Beta 1 to RC1 after such a massive rebuild may suggest
over-confidence.


--=20
Rory O'Farrell <ofarrwrk@iol.ie>