From ooo-dev-return-13563-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Feb 24 08:06:33 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 096CF9603 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35321 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2012 08:06:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35173 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2012 08:06:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35164 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2012 08:06:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:06:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:06:27 +0000 Received: by werc1 with SMTP id c1so1319125wer.6 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:06:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 10.180.109.228 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.109.228; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 10.180.109.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jogischmidt@googlemail.com; dkim=pass header.i=jogischmidt@googlemail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.109.228]) by 10.180.109.228 with SMTP id hv4mr2675985wib.11.1330070765750 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:06:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sdA3T6Kzfxcw5+q4hPQqPLqRHCoG6jsjxCQqRXp8GaI=; b=TNcmmE3sLxt4OPZIyagvFRoKfn6GKB624iETaOwhEki5FmLVSWI61WQl6HxFys1tOP VgZZhwW3EUHIg2kIc8DWQk1G1yzQFq1kNED+Bj02hIY5uVau/P+0qC6rK7tLqQ2Tmc6d dmPotqs5+4YvMN9M/VPctl1lT1OWyFHRdZo9w= Received: by 10.180.109.228 with SMTP id hv4mr2157105wib.11.1330070765675; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:06:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [9.155.131.21] (deibp9eh1--blueice4n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gf3sm1748764wib.6.2012.02.24.00.06.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:06:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4744EC.6090206@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:06:04 +0100 From: =?GB2312?B?Sqi5cmdlbiBTY2htaWR0?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Plan to deliver the GUI test Java library on the next release References: <2AE44CCA-23F5-4AA8-84AB-FBA44804B5B6@gmail.com> <4F473D44.6040007@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F473D44.6040007@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2/24/12 8:33 AM, O.Felka wrote: > Am 24.02.2012 06:20, schrieb Zhe Liu: >> 在 2012年2月24日 上午10:37，Ma Yong Lin 写道： >>> I think what was asked is if we are just get a group of star basic test cases "translated" >>> to java. It would be the same in terms of testing. >>> >> We can do that, but I think it's more meaningful to cover the GUI >> testing for new functions in future, since the existing function has >> been very stable. > > I think that it is worth the effort and very helpfull to translate the > old Star Basic tests to Java. We have had always regressions in the > existing and 'stable' functions. So we really need the old tests for > finding regressions in the existing functionality. every test if old or new working with this new automation tool is welcome and highly appreciated. Maybe it's easier for new develoeprs to work with existing tests and make them available for the new environment. Volunteers are always welcome. But in generaI would agree that we should focus on new tests for new changes. And most people would like to work on something new ;-) Juergen > > Olaf > > >> >>> So besides java developer may benefit from this, anything else? >> >> The library will wrap all complex things and aims to make learning >> curve enough short for both programmer and non-programmer. In >> addition, localization developers may benefit from it to locate some >> UI. I'm not sure and need to investigate further. >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ma Yong Lin >>> >>> mayongl@apache.org >>> >>> 在 2012-2-23，9:38，Zhe Liu 写道： >>> >>>> 2012/2/23 FR web forum: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> As mentioned before, I plan to replace VCL TestTool with a Java >>>>>>> library for GUI testing. >>>>> >>>>> Do you think that a translation in other languages could improve >>>>> its usefulness? >>>> Sorry. I didn't catch you. You mean translate that wiki or the tool >>>> in other languages? >>>> Thank for your suggestion. >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards >>>> From aliuzhe@gmail.com >> >> The previous discussion is here. >> http://markmail.org/thread/nz4mgwk3k3b3rb2w#query:+page:1+mid:aalron753ul3rb5f+state:res >> >> >