incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From eric b <eric.bach...@free.fr>
Subject Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012/2/22(2012/2/15~2012/2/22)
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:12:59 GMT
Hi,

Thank you very much for this very complete and interesting work.

It realy helps to make a point on the current Apache OpenOffice  
status, and IMHO, worth to be communicated.


Regards,
Eric Bachard


Le 23 févr. 12 à 04:21, xia zhao a écrit :

> Hello everyone!  This is Lily (Xia Zhao) in Beijing.  I've been  
> working on
> QA for AOO 3.4.  I will give a weekly report on the quality of the 3.4
> Apache OpenOffice.  Not everyone watches 100% of BZ notifications.  A
> report is a good way to know the status.
>
> *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
> *Based on the test plan:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan
> 55% IP clearance testing have been done.  These are the tests of  
> areas most
> impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
> 70% general testing have been done.  These are general functional  
> tests.
> *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/22 (2012/2/15 -  
> 2012/2/22):
> *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev. 1240836,1240872,1243392
> Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac 10.6.8, Ubuntu 10.04, Redhat 6.1
> Test Cases Executed:
>
> 6 modules of IP clearance
> ooo_crystal_images-1.tar.gz
> ooo_oxygen_images-2009-06-17
> 3rd party/external library javamail
> 3rd party/external library gdk-pixbuf
> libneon removement testing
> berkeleydb
> 5 function areas of General testing:
> Installer (Clean/Upgrade)
> Security
> Toolbar
> Chart (still 60% left)
> Writer Envelope
>
> *Defects Summary:
> *So far 282 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and 3.4m0
> Among them, 44 critical defects raised and 23 ones remain opening now.
> 21 defects raised in this week,and 4 defects closed.
>
> So far based on my observation and my testing, no much special  
> platform
> problems. Though some bugs are makred with specifical platform but  
> I need
> double check if it is due to reporter only has that platform build  
> or it
> did only reproduced on given platform. Currently most bugs about core
> functions, undo/redo is one weak area, also the stability is one  
> potential
> problem. Next week we plan do more interoperability testing and more
> stability general testing, suppose more defects may be raised.
>
> *Risk:
> *The high risk for AOO 3.4 is during the migration from OO to AOO,  
> many
> test cases lost and no one large automation suite can be used for
> regression testing now. So I did appreciate everyone's contribution  
> to QA
> works.
>
> If you have interesting in QA work and decide to contribute to it,  
> please
> go to AOO 3.4 main page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA.
> Get dev build from:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4 
> +Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
> Write your case by edit this page:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/
> And place your result:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults
>
> Or you may just do general testing based on your usage without test  
> cases
> or testing result and just raise defects in Bugzilla directly:
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
>
> Any contribution is welcome and can contribute to this project's  
> success!
>
> Thanks&Best Regrads,
>
> Lily

-- 
qɔᴉɹə
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news






Mime
View raw message