incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: selling open office
Date Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:36:22 GMT
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>
> But the question is where do we draw the line?

Agreed.


> At one pole, I think we all agree that released versions of AOO,
> approved by the PMC and made available on the Apache mirrors,are
> properly called "Apache OpenOffice".
>
> I think also, that most of us agree that exactly copies (MD5 hashes
> match, etc.) of these releases may also be referred to as Apache
> OpenOffice, whether distributed via other websites, on CD's, even if
> offered for sale.  This doesn't mean all cases are acceptable.  If I
> form a company called "OpenOffice Direct" and sell CD's of AOO from my
> website and use the AOO logo, then this is a problem.

Indeed.   Just to throw an example scenario out there... I could see
a case where my company (Fogbeam Labs) might want to ship a customized
Apache OpenOffice distro.  In that scenario, my current thinking would be
that it would be called something like "Fogbeam Office" and that somewhere
would live a statement like "Based on Apache OpenOffice" or "Powered By
Apache OpenOffice" etc.   Clarifying the details of that sort of situation would
be of particular interest to me.


Phil

Mime
View raw message