incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Herbert Duerr <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Does anyone build AOO under *csh?
Date Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:15:05 GMT
> No objection to your plan but in general I do dislike the excessive
> dependence we have on bash. Perhaps you can clean the bash
> script too? It doesn't look too bad:
>
>  > checkbashisms FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh
> script FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh does not appear to have a #! interpreter line

That's easy.

> possible bashism in FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh line 266 (alias):
> alias mkout="perl $SOLARENV/bin/mkout.pl"
> possible bashism in FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh line 267 (alias):
> alias deliver="perl $SOLARENV/bin/deliver.pl"
> possible bashism in FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh line 268 (alias):
> alias build="perl $SOLARENV/bin/build.pl"
> possible bashism in FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh line 269 (alias):
> alias build_client="perl $SOLARENV/bin/build_client.pl"
> possible bashism in FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh line 270 (alias):
> alias zipdep="perl $SOLARENV/bin/zipdep.pl"
> possible bashism in FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh line 271 (alias):
> alias nmake="dmake"

What is the problem with these alias commands? Of course the *csh 
equivalents would omit the equal sign, but do any non-csh shells have a 
different syntax here?

Herbert

Mime
View raw message