Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14A1C9CE6 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77507 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 21:38:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77435 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 21:38:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77423 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2012 21:38:53 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:38:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:38:53 +0000 Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so13166681vbb.6 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:38:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.35.13 with SMTP id d13mr7470437vdj.55.1325626732281; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.228.201 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:38:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <465EA464-41E9-46C0-B809-65B94B716999@Janik.cz> References: <20E89F55-70EA-43F5-AE4F-79E5F698DE9D@Janik.cz> <465EA464-41E9-46C0-B809-65B94B716999@Janik.cz> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:38:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2012/1/3 Pavel Jan=C3=ADk : >> we would use (TM). =C2=A0At some point, say after we actually have a >> release, then we could ask Apache to pursue registration for "Apache >> OpenOffice" > > Why would we do so if we know that Sun/Oracle could not get it registered= (and thus have chosen OpenOffice.org instead)? We're talking about the full mark, "Apache OpenOffice". I have no reason to think this could not be registered. In any case, we already discussed this, voted, and the choice was "Apache OpenOffice". We're now talking about the graphical ogo that will reflect that name. > -- > Pavel Jan=C3=ADk > > >