Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 518A0B1AA for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26562 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 19:39:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26460 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 19:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26449 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2012 19:39:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:39:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dwhytock@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.54] (HELO mail-qw0-f54.google.com) (209.85.216.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:39:49 +0000 Received: by qaea17 with SMTP id a17so1158892qae.6 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:39:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZQblPHiNBiSCFX/gkzN3e2psYlBfXNzVLBHLqpwLmlM=; b=UJz4p0fbZDvJaUMvODS5Mc0wj4Lf+kLY5FB99SUilmBTLypQjzMgLeeScYhNDgH4y7 EErMo4rmvgN0wstU1vF2KidCgXldQS3zA//PgEboTpL6aiv1J72K1BkAX5bz6kVF6+Bt GOUBVGS3I8FXdAp6FdrUtWO4FBd2ErLiz6Bzc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.111.6 with SMTP id q6mr24268992qap.65.1326915568854; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.105.18 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:39:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <012a01ccd612$78ad4b00$6a07e100$@acm.org> References: <375C09FC-EA61-4DB4-B3E5-7D184153F246@comcast.net> <012a01ccd612$78ad4b00$6a07e100$@acm.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:39:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 18 Jan 2012: SOPA and PIPA Protest Banner From: Donald Whytock To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Including the list this time. Watch those reply-tos, Dennis...:) On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Don, > > What's your understanding of the connection between open-source encryptio= n algorithms and SOPA/PIPA? =A0Where is there more information available? This was the EFF article I saw on the topic: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/hollywood-new-war-on-software-freedom= -and-internet-innovation It's a little alarmist, but the general tone is that if some idiot can think there's any relationship between software that hides information and efforts to circumvent DNS censorship, the site that provides said software can find itself blocked. Feel free to substitute "government official" for "idiot" as needed. Seriously, how many politicians do you know that really know what security software does? They don't have to be right. They just have to have the authority.