Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-11676-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03564B213
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Fri,  6 Jan 2012 11:44:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 88744 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2012 11:44:53 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88388 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2012 11:44:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88376 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2012 11:44:39 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:44:39 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [212.27.42.2] (HELO smtp2-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.2)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:44:32 +0000
Received: from [192.168.50.45] (unknown [88.166.8.11])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6EA4B0294
	for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2012 12:44:07 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <4F06D885.90106@googlemail.com>
References: <4F06CD69.5000408@a-w-f.de> <4F06D2F8.5090906@a-w-f.de>
 <4F06D885.90106@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--349322796
Message-Id: <8ED963E1-D0ED-497A-A913-6DE14F5D0D99@free.fr>
From: eric b <eric.bachard@free.fr>
Subject: Re: /usr/bin/openoffice.org
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:43:48 +0100
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--Apple-Mail-4--349322796
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=UTF-8;
	delsp=yes;
	format=flowed

Hi J=C3=BCrgen,


Le 6 janv. 12 =C3=A0 12:18, J=C3=BCrgen Schmidt a =C3=A9crit :

> On 1/6/12 11:54 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
>> Ah, found another one:
>>
>> Synaptic on Ubuntu 11.10 has a package "openoffice.org" which =20
>> installs
>> LibreOffice. It is not installed by default (the "libreoffice" =20
>> package
>> is) and also provides the 'explanation'
>>
>> <quote>
>> This is a transitional package, replacing the OpenOffice.org =20
>> packaging
>> with the LibreOffice packaging.
>>
>> It can be safely removed after an upgrade.
>> </quote>
>>
>> but still, is this OK?
>
> it sounds strange and not really ok for me.


Same for me.


> First they could still support older versions of OOo and second we =20
> would probably like to reserve this package name for an upgrade to =20
> AOO if possible at a later time.
>
> I hope we can find some support for this later. But using the name =20
> and installing something different is of course confusing and =20
> misleading, isn't it?
>


I'm complaining about that since several month (e.g. on this list 23 =20
november 11h19). Glad to see I'm not the only one now.


Regards,
Eric


--=20
q=C9=94=E1=B4=89=C9=B9=C9=99
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news






--Apple-Mail-4--349322796--