Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B780BB8A7 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13312 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 16:49:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13258 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 16:49:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13249 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 16:49:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:49:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:49:32 +0000 Received: by wgbdt12 with SMTP id dt12so26032745wgb.0 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:49:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fFSFYoM9kxJHIujxQ3vf4q9TunizteUwAWE4IE1lKjI=; b=bsQUSJh/WFa/brmMTX1dAi+eqa81QI6WO/bqj6ruPjrCtFJHvQtoXceoUnF+61Q6DP w6TGk8WLX7R+sEVHm213ERl9+1yF2QHXPyGR9YStzElIHG6LuDMIbxdHPdm37C6hMG5V lPB02N7obHk5XjUZ29FEBYA2kjQQFr/hCexhI= Received: by 10.227.206.76 with SMTP id ft12mr56420545wbb.1.1325695752327; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:49:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [9.155.131.21] (deibp9eh1--blueice3n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9sm84332803wie.8.2012.01.04.08.49.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:49:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F048306.8010901@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:49:10 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding References: <4F04258D.8040400@googlemail.com> <1325691253.2331.19.camel@sybil-gnome> <8E3C2697-61C7-4BE2-93DC-F5D04F1F9550@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <8E3C2697-61C7-4BE2-93DC-F5D04F1F9550@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/4/12 5:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:34 AM, drew wrote: > >> On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:10 +0100, J�rgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 1/3/12 11:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>>> >>>>> A month ago Drew sent a logo proposal to the ooo-marketing list. It >>>>> has been discussed and iterated on that list. The current state of >>>>> the proposal is on the wiki: >>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal >>>>> >>>>> Personally I think this is fine work, and since we've received no >>>>> counter-proposals in the last month, we should go ahead and update the >>>>> splash screen and website with the new logo. That's my opinion. >>>>> However, others have suggested we take a RTC approach to this. So be >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> Please review the logo proposal on the above wiki page. If you have a >>>>> counter proposal now, or if you intend to make a counter-proposal but >>>>> need more time, then please speak up. But if there are no other >>>>> proposals, then we have lazy consensus. >>>>> >>>>> Considering that some project members may still be on vacation, I'd >>>>> like to leave this open for another full week. >>>>> >>>>> -Rob >>>>> >>>> >>>> These are wonderful! I'm not subscribed to the marketing list so I hadn't >>>> seen the full suite until just now. >>>> >>>> For the install graphic, I would prefer : >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/27832565/Image_aooi.bmp?version=1&modificationDate=1324462312000 >>> >>> i would prefer this one, but i am not sure about the URL. Shouldn't it >>> be www.openoffice.org as the main entry point from the perspective of a >>> user who simply install it wherever it comes from (download, magazine >>> CD, promotion USB stick, ...) >>> >>> @Drew, can you help to prepare one for the SDK as well? >> >> Howdy, >> >> yes I can do that - Ok, reading the thread then I will go ahead starting >> today and finish, I guess two sets of graphics >> One set of final logo art for both web and print. >> One set of art for the code, based on the design, such as the image >> referenced above. >> >> I have time to do this straight through, so I can't see taking more then >> this week. >> >> There are a number of references in the earlier thread to images in the >> code base, maybe covering everything needed I will look at those and put >> up a proposed replacement, for each, to the wiki page as produced, folks >> can give a quick review and afterwards I'd check them into svn - sound >> right? > > While you are at it please have a look at http://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html wow, a perfect example where a complete rework would be very useful for the overall user experience. As a first step i think we can skip the image map and can point to the next product page where of course are also some changes necessary to remove or replace the application icons. Juergen > > Thanks, > Dave > > >> >> Thanks, >> >> //drew >> >> >>> >>> Juergen >>> >>>> >>>> -- or -- >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/27832565/Image_aooi_wht.bmp?version=1&modificationDate=1325048664000 >>>> >>>> since we're going for a rebranding... >>>> >>>> Great work by Drew (and perhaps others!) >>> >>> >> >> >