Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F23CFB58C for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43698 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 23:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43340 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 23:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43326 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 23:58:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:58:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:58:13 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716B520BEB for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:57:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:57:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=U+elnAJrfYoTTZv7MKGEfkNoNlg=; b=vj7HA KrRubqR1jpVUDYuJ6JhkMgbYTw23J4FSH112sbniDDrCbTKTE7lKJeBBYJaL9im+ 2CfrSBjUyWVioyUoEtwFWCfJwukrMCdURtiySc9DiwUupSeLh3XA2iw+77A3dcb3 h5oZ+JAEkoZYoKPWV0QeQpX7UOPb+xm0syGrGM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=U+elnAJrfYoTTZv7MKGEfkNoNlg=; b=pWO8 WpbvWue47TUvkGiVLxCuSfiKetg+YpMi4emkatYvIIhJj9TAhZ7ZJ6VXXlu+jBDy nkoY/hQ/1beQvwqP1smIh9HOHf+bT1voz4uCzvX9RB4Vciqt1FYeSwQDIs1i7m4W Gi5GDuBvg28lACp4D12mEUxH69gJ6VQLUwQ1YXs= X-Sasl-enc: 4WH74AivxyILn3jyKHebQjm6D29aHtyD8oywWrkCSjjUJ/WjIhSTYd++2G+SEw 1325721471 Received: from daniel3.local (bzq-109-65-192-177.red.bezeqint.net [109.65.192.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 740F4482492; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:57:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 01:57:40 +0200 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Joe Schaefer Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" , infrastructure@apache.org Subject: Re: suggested CMS workflows for ooo-site Message-ID: <20120104235740.GA28956@daniel3.local> References: <1325694487.26057.YahooMailNeo@web160903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1325695906.80326.YahooMailNeo@web160906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1325698191.35878.YahooMailNeo@web160901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1325699559.19044.YahooMailNeo@web160904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1325699559.19044.YahooMailNeo@web160904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Joe Schaefer wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:52:39 -0800: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Dave Fisher > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:40 PM > > Subject: Re: suggested CMS workflows for ooo-site > > > > > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > >> Also Dave get in the habit of checking buildbot for the > >> build status of sledgehammer commits instead of waiting > >> for svnmailer to figure out what to do with the massive > >> diff it's trying to make sense of.� The url is > >> > >> > >> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ooo-site-site-staging > > > > I do do that, but tend to wait for the email anyway. If there is no reason to > > wait that will save time. > > Buildbot performs the commit back as the final step in the build, > so if buildbot thinks the build has completed successfully, you > do not need to wait for svnmailer to send out a notice to that effect. > > My experience is that the turnaround between sledgehammer commits > and eventual publication is about 1 hour: ~20 min for each step > along the way, all because of svn committing or merging Instead of: % cd production-wc % svn merge $URL/to/staging can you: % svnmucc -mm rm $URL/to/production cp $somerev $URL/to/staging $URL/to/production > huge volumes > of data.