Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 17:01:24 -0300
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile <arielch@apache.org>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] AOO cannot be installed
Message-ID: <20120102200124.GC13940@localhost>
References: <4F001CA0.6020000@mechtilde.de>
 <CAHZP38AjOUMLTJSjNLwoG5PVTvdVaDCqjR0_VObSAuH6meJ0NQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F01DC3E.1070304@mechtilde.de>
 <7F5B658E-F91C-46D2-BDE4-C1C72CA0EFC3@comcast.net>
 <4F01FA5F.6040802@gmx.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F01FA5F.6040802@gmx.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:41:35PM +0100, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi Dave
>=20
> Just to clarify. Mechtilde is a contributor since day 0 - 7 years.
> She is one of the moast experienced QA here, and a verry skilled
> manual tester. So she is not a newbe at all.
>=20
> I build only for mac, for linux i point to the Buildbot too. If this
> builds don't work for a Linux distribution it is a serios problem,
> so it's right to bring it on the list.
>=20
> What Mechtilde miss, are de frequently snapshots from the project it
> self, not from same contributors. The test build should be from the
> same mashine as the final release. You can build AOO on two
> computers with Linux, you will have two different builds even you
> use the same revision.
>=20
> For this reason, test builds has to come from the same mashin as the
> release. For my point of view it's not a good idea to use a
> contributors computer for it. So the main plattform Wendows, Linux,
> Mac realy need a Buildbot, and this is not a "nice to have" it's a
> *realy urgent task*
>=20
> And if one of this Buildbot produce unusable builds, then we have a
> serios problem.

Those build are unusable due to the EPM version, a subject that has been
discussed since the epm removal, so I have no idea why the buildboot
ended with a system epm.

IMO the Linux build boot should produce also RPM packages, not only
DEBs. And nightly builds are useful for keeping the code base buildable,
but for testing purposes it would be more useful a weekly developer
snapshot.


Regards
--=20
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=HchR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx--