From ooo-dev-return-11571-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Jan 4 20:53:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 722A0B223 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19169 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 20:53:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19118 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 20:53:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19110 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 20:53:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:53:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.213.149] (HELO nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.213.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:53:47 +0000 Received: from [98.139.212.150] by nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2012 20:53:26 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.204] by tm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2012 20:53:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2012 20:53:26 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 48714.11682.bm@omp1013.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 33214 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Jan 2012 20:53:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1325710405; bh=UbbXu0fk4eO4JG5f//zYQA0UIK5CBbIlpzZf3xWLd+M=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pIfhyOYmzrAIJSvU0+BJ9S4ulJ5xMsR7QQnTs2FPqUpXwbewgovVMqCxyPwF41fhIya5ALrHPJvVe4Hg/vns7siFn6ZIhxyvYB9GJUxz0t/RCy0/zGEES71ZsrBTQs7TaR/dZQ+p30Dfqr0PEl+5L9Y79kqyDjNxUZu57q+zXRw= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AF+Ttj1J7jwfII3iQBh1MrP60R4snzETnhl0CfWwA4KDdaUfRdphYSkdGXUGEJnEZg0JuZvFGnjWGxgCQslfn022TaD+PlI4Npf94lmijlTw7905Y/nGs8/VaRtrrbRpJC5SPnQCGn2/n8JmFoO9q2LtBphsPJIiIj5hxzZzYGw=; X-YMail-OSG: 9uou30wVM1nmo.z_eP9HnMujCDucaUvI6IwrrqCiLCwATVk bMG8HSg8r_OQeLJk1mpq5krrE1wMPSppqsMPILeid2HyU_9f5o29wf7HyEGK 8bCQgzuCDWHJCnYx9fwUqbsU4iESTRgDg7BhAYkj56VPz8Kuyj8uceK6hn0m azyx9_a3hiJ5iaKNfmO7ZVTL9S73PdbBHfw8HyM9HDlg6G9RPP1tpnosLPQU 7R6FLO0lqucKqUCFBjATTOKwwkILhLXVZtCUWC._uiwYsRFar0Y89XHhmVM1 zAwvjfGVQjnvcK.ICqX8PE7nwVGZRg66zEWjcmZWRJoiGMOf_DjIygGEHz_k N8FE2kl9FCbp4cvErOEKcICQ8F09XmvrwgRb53o4UfZR191lNxNLr.behtPp _6NSmrW8xCAgQiY7rdg2.Xy0jpHHBde7_FsUG2GfkYlMzE05zozW.7Q8gRlJ jGCKp6Wip2w-- Received: from [99.135.28.65] by web160904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:53:25 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 References: <1325687880.31665.YahooMailClassic@web113514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4F04A976.7080701@oracle.com> <1325708903.58734.YahooMailNeo@web160901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1325710405.28014.YahooMailNeo@web160904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:53:25 -0800 (PST) From: Joe Schaefer Reply-To: Joe Schaefer Subject: Re: Question related derivative code based on our Apache licensed code To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org =0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A> From: Simon Phipps =0A> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org=0A> Cc: =0A> Sent: Wednesday,= January 4, 2012 3:41 PM=0A> Subject: Re: Question related derivative code = based on our Apache licensed code=0A> =0A> =0A> On 4 Jan 2012, at 20:28, Jo= e Schaefer wrote:=0A>> It depends on how that is actually done:=0A> =0A> T= here is indeed plenty of detail to take into consideration, and we could = =0A> ping-pong the discussion around many nuances if we wanted to (for exam= ple: =0A> there's often no need to edit the file to change the way it is li= censed as =0A> part of a larger work). =0A> =0A> One benefit there seems to= be from having me join a thread is people add a lot =0A> more detail to th= e discussion in order to correct me, even when we agree. =0A> Suffice to sa= y we're generally agreed that J=FCrgen's original assumption =0A> ("This co= de becomes automatically Apache licensed, correct?") is =0A> probably not r= ight :-)=0A=0AYes, well the point I'm trying to make is that for *our* purp= oses (eg interpreting the=0Alicensing on a "contribution" to a derivative w= ork) the *unmodified files* that=0Aare only marked as having Apache license= headers in them govern patches based=0Asolely on such files, irrespective = of the licensing on a larger derivative work=0Aof the whole work.=A0 *And* = that such unmodified files will be present in =0Amany derivatives that make= use of our codebase.=0A=0AI realize that wasn't quite the question J=FCrge= n asked, but it's a better question=0Ato address ;-).=A0 Sorry for the pote= ntial confusion.