From ooo-dev-return-11878-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jan 10 01:09:32 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D81D9046 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33128 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 01:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33019 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 01:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33011 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 01:09:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org designates 75.98.160.131 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.98.160.131] (HELO a2s15.a2hosting.com) (75.98.160.131) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:09:25 +0000 Received: from 63-226-219-46.tukw.qwest.net ([63.226.219.46] helo=Astraendo) by a2s15.a2hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkQD2-00035c-2S for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:09:04 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: References: <4F0B2F50.5090500@oracle.com> <1326133498.31378.YahooMailClassic@web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1326133893.20873.YahooMailNeo@web160903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1326134305.45806.YahooMailNeo@web160906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:09:03 -0800 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <017701cccf34$72438b60$56caa220$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQL0Q7fmDO2c7edc/X/ghXzvva1Z+gJNdkFoAdRn3YQCN5w3igGdARlGAYQrGJgCFhCe5QGFYZ1dALukoGmTR1HEIA== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s15.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org Apparently, the bugzilla-admin@apache.org e-mail is an alias for an = infrastructure list, perhaps infrastructure@ itself. Issues that are = specific to the AOO Podling bugzilla don't reach a project designee, if = there is one, in any direct way. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: lohmaier@googlemail.com [mailto:lohmaier@googlemail.com] On Behalf = Of Christian Lohmaier Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 15:56 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding Hi *, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Dave Fisher = wrote: > > Who are our projects BZ admins? Are there remaining issues. No idea if there are any, at least the contact given on the bugzilla page itself to report problems is a black hole, no response nor fixin ghte reported problem (xmlrpc). http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3= CCAOPHaVRC6ZqZMX_XVNeivYFQR6sq_ucdtqjWcE3xPtF-zVd5%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com%3= E It has been suggested that infra issues via jira are necessary to get in touch with the AOOo-bugzilla admins, but issues.apache.org/ooo/ still reads: "This is Apache OOo Bugzilla: the Apache OOo podling bug system. In case of problems with the functioning of Apache OOo Bugzilla, please contact bugzilla-admin@apache.org. Please Note: this e-mail address is only for reporting problems with Apache OOo Bugzilla. Mail about any other subject will be silently ignored." But that's a detail, and I already took the non-response as an implicit WONTFIX - but as you brought up the topic... ciao Christian