incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com>
Subject Re: Category-B tarballs in SVN (was Re: External libraries)
Date Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:15:08 GMT
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Jan 13, 2012 4:02 PM, "Andre Fischer" <af@a-w-f.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 13.01.2012 16:25, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>> For what it is worth, I agree with Joe here. The question is whether
there
>> is a valid reason to keep them here.
>
>
> I don't know if the reasons are valid.  We are trying to find a
pragmatical solution that is a good compromise for the different
requirements of the ASF, the OpenOffice developers/community, and the
OpenOffice users:
>
> - For the ASF we use no code under category X license and try to use as
little code under category B license.
>
> - For the users we want to retain as many features as possible.
>
> - For the developers we want to make development as accessible as
possible.
>

Why is it necessary to include source rather than just binaries?

Ross

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message