incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [WWW] rebranding...
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:18:39 GMT
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 3, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- Mar 3/1/12, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>> OK, we got to see the new logo and a
> >>>> bit of a discussion has ensued re the
> >>>> now Apache hosted http://www.openoffice.org/ and the
> >>>> existing logo on that
> >>>> site.
> >>>>
> >>>> My question concerns the extent of "future" rebranding.
> >>>>
> >>>> yes, it's pretty easy to just change out the logo, but
> >>>> should anticipate
> >>>> changing out ALL occurrences of OpenOffice.org to "Apache
> >>>> OpenOffice" as well?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts on this?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I think it wouldn't hurt to leave some references to the
> >>> old brand. Something like "Apache OpenOffice, formerly
> >>> OpenOffice.org" in the main pages and Apache OpenOffice
> >>> in the rest.
> >>>
> >>
> >> That's an interesting idea.  I wonder whether it would work to have
> >> such a "transition" graphic that we use prominently for the next
> >> couple of months, until 3.4 is released?
> >>
> >> It might be worth thinking about how we could do something like that
> >> on the website.  So keep the main branding logo, but have the ability
> >> to insert another banner ad or similar on each page that could be used
> >> for things like a release announcement, conference promotion, or
> >> similar announcement that we want to make broadly known.
> >
> > I think that most of this differentiation can be done at the first
> folder level using the same structure used for leftnav and topnav overrides.
> >
> > Here is how it is done.
> >
> > We add to templates a brand.mdtext which contains parameter definitions.
> >
> > home: Home
> > search: Search
> > name: Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
> > bannercenter: (incubating)&nbsp;|&nbsp;The Free and Open Productivity
> Suite
> > bannerlogo: ooo-logo.png
> > legacytag: This page is for OpenOffice.org 3.3
> >
> > For NLC folders a file like "templates/de/brand.mdtext" would contain
> German language versions of these strings.
> >
> > Then skeleton.html is changed like so:
> >
> >    <div id="bannerleft"><img id="ooo-logo" alt="{{ brand.name }}"
> src="/images/{{ brand.bannerlogo }}"/></div>
> >
> >            <input name="Button" value="{{ brand.search }}" type="submit"
> class="topsrchbutton"/>
> >
> >    <div id="bannercenter"><br/>{{ brand.bannercenter }}</div>
> >
> >  <div id="content">
> >    {% block legacy %}{% if brand.legacytag %}<h1 class="legacy">{{
> brand.legacytag }}</h1>{% endif %}{% endblock %}
> >
> >
> > Add a .legacy tag to css/ooo.css.
>
> I implemented the above this evening. The www.openoffice.org/api/ section
> now has a "legacy" message.
>
> The main correction to the above plan is that brand.foo tags needed to be
> brand.headers.foo.
>
> Here are the brand.mdtext files I created:
>
> templates/api/brand.mdtext
> home:           home
> search:         search
> name:           Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
> tagline:        (incubating) | The Free and Open Productivity Suite
> logo:           ooo-logo.png
> domain:         www.openoffice.org
> legacy:         Content for OpenOffice.org version 3.3.
>
> templates/brand.mdtext
> home:           home
> search:         search
> name:           Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
> tagline:        (incubating) | The Free and Open Productivity Suite
> logo:           ooo-logo.png
> domain:         www.openoffice.org
>
> Any file like templates/foo/brand.mdtext completely replaces
> templates/brand.mdtext parameters. Ideally only the needed parameters like
> legacy would need to be in the "foo" brand.mdtext. In this case,
>
> templates/api/brand.mdtext
> legacy:         Content for OpenOffice.org version 3.3.
>
> Suggestions?
>

I think your original question concerned the logo, right? From my
perspective, ALL logos (i.e. top left banner images) should be the same for
ALL pages regardless of content. SO I agree with Rob on his earlier
response on this item

Now, for your other suggestions regarding "page content" vis a vis OO.O vs
AOO.  I think this has merit. But, I wonder about the ultimate overhead of
this in some cases with the template approach vs a page change approach.
This is  worthwhile for something as important as the "api" reference
documents. In other cases, maybe just some less involved edits to pages
indicating the content pertains to the 3.3. version would suffice. It's
nice that we can tailor the site in this way, but, I’m just wondering about
the  overhead.

Is the "template" area one of those areas that involves a VERY large
rebuild, for example?

Just wondering.


> >
> > If we want to add a metatag or comment to specific pages then we can
> extract that using the technique that Joe used to remove the use of sed
> today. Thanks Joe!
>
> If and when this distinction is needed changes can be made to view.pm and
> skeleton.html
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> >>
> >>> Pedro.
> >
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"You will always be lucky if you know how to make friends
 with strange cats."
                                                  -- *Colonial American
proverb*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message