incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jürgen Schmidt <>
Subject Re: Extensions hosting
Date Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:37:20 GMT
On 1/13/12 12:32 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> 2012/1/13 Jürgen Schmidt<>:
>> Hi Ross,
>> sorry for my top posting.
>> I have only one point that is important for me. The hosting aspect of binary
>> extensions and templates is a very important part and we should ensure can
>> we can provide such a service in some way.
> Yes, I think we all (including the board) agree. This is evidenced by
> their willingness to approve Gavs proposal.
> Can you please state explicitly whether you perceive a problem with
> the SF proposal or not. It is my understanding that the consensus here
> is to accept the SF proposal, it is this that I am seeking advice from
> the board on.

yes i support the SF proposal as well.

My point was that in your email to the board this point was not clear 
enough for me.

> I don't want to open up the whole discussion again,
me too


the majority
> position is certainly to accept the SF proposal. However, if you feel
> this is a mistake I would like to understand you precise concerns so
> that I might respond to any questions from the board with maximum
> clarity.
> Note the proposal taken to the board is for the SF proposal to be an
> interim solution with the intention of the AOO project providing a
> longer term solution more tailored to the needs of the project and its
> users.
> Ross

View raw message