incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Lauder <>
Subject Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding
Date Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:28:22 GMT
On Monday 09 Jan 2012 17:57:55 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Thanks Graham!
> --- Dom 8/1/12, Graham Lauder <> ha scritto:
> ...
> > > I'm not sure any of these are killer objections to the
> > > use of a commercial font.  But I think we'd want a strong
> > > design reason for not using a font with few or no
> > > restrictions.
> > 
> > +1, the old font was a commercial one: Frutiger, which
> > caused all sorts of  issues when being used by the
> > community Artists. 
> > There are plenty of similar fonts about.  The "best"
> > solution was Liberation Sans at 60% IIRC.  But that
> > was just to try and maintain the old logo look as close as
> > possible. 
> Android fonts are under AL2, and there's also the plus that
> they should display very well on mobile devices which have
> become so important nowadays. FWIW, I am playing (just playing)
> with Android Sans at 60% but my uneducated eye doesn't notice much
> difference.

The biggest problem with using many typefaces in shortened form is that if the 
contrast is low on the original typeface, you can end up with a negative 

This was one of the disadvantages of the Liberation and Deja Vu font families 
at anything under 80% a stem would end up thinner than the shoulder, most 
obviously in an O.  Additionally, Frutiger had a high contrast so to maintain 
the look was difficult just by shortening typeface.


> I certainly agree the font is not as important as so many
> other factors that should be taken into account.
> I haven't yet got to the aesthetic and general marketing issues
> you mentioned so there is truly a lot to think and this is not
> really anywhere near my priorities lately so no promises
> from my side, but I surely had to say that you hit the nail in
> this posting.
> Pedro.


View raw message