incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding
Date Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:38:25 GMT
Look Rob, it is clear you lack any notion of the years of
history infra has had supporting new initiatives for projects
that were brought here, and have no grasp of how rude your
remarks are to the people who try to service this particular
project's needs and interests.

Go ask Geronimo people about their attitudes towards our wiki
deployments over the years to get some feel for the game you
are trying to play.  We're long past those days now.



----- Original Message -----
> From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2012 1:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding
> 
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> 
> wrote:
>>  -1.  There is no shame in using 3rd party services for unofficial
>>  business such as surveys and polls.  Please get out of the nasty
>>  habit of thinking that what's good for this project is good for
>>  the org, it doesn't help matters at all and will only serve to
>>  alienate infra people from addressing your specific needs.
>> 
> 
> Joe, there should be shame in your comments above.  Please take your
> "nasty habit" comments elsewhere.
> 
> I think this project has enhanced Apache and Infra's view of what is
> possible at Apache, and that this is to the benefit of all Apache
> projects.
> 
> -Rob
> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
>>>  To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>  Cc:
>>>  Sent: Monday, January 9, 2012 1:28 PM
>>>  Subject: Re: Moving ahead with the AOO logo and rebranding
>>> 
>>>  On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>>>>   ...
>>>>   --- Lun 9/1/12, Andrew Rist <andrew.rist@oracle.com> ha 
> scritto:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   On 1/8/2012 5:59 PM, Graham Lauder wrote:
>>>>>   > <snip>
>>>>>   > What did you have in mind for the survey itself?
>>>>>   Were you thinking of
>>>>>   > SurveyMonkey?
>>>>>   > Survey monkey is good, though personally I prefer
>>>>>   Zoomerang, but I'm with
>>>>>   > Claudio,  Lime Survey is great  and we have
>>>>>   an instance in place already that
>>>>>   > we possibly could use before Oracle pulls the plug
>>>>>   entirely.
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > Possible Andrew?
>>>>>   All this infra is getting decommissioned as stuff moves to
>>>>>   ASF.  What's the link to the Lime Survey?  Is that 
> actually
>>>>>   online?
>>>>>   Even if it's still around, we should look for a more
>>>>>   forward looking solution that we can reuse on future projects.
>>>>>   (thus probably not a good idea to use, even if it's still
>>>>>   around)
>>>> 
>>>>   AFAIR,
>>>> 
>>>>   Lime Survey has a free online service. I am not sure of the
>>>>   conditions (ad supported, fewer questions maybe) but it
>>>>   should be enough for most purposes.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>  And if we want to host this at Apache, I bet other projects would use
>>>  it as well, probably also the Foundation.
>>> 
>>>  Pre-reqs are not particularly complicated:
>>> 
>>> 
> http://docs.limesurvey.org/Installation&structure=English+Instructions+for+LimeSurvey#Make_sure_you_can_use_LimeSurvey_on_your_website
>>> 
>>>>   Pedro.
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Mime
View raw message