Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B1837723 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68982 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2011 00:37:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68920 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2011 00:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68912 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2011 00:37:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:37:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:36:52 +0000 Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so19277635wgb.0 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opendirective.com; s=opendirective; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=3kvyOXdWcICCD0tJpyq9+bfGzwHqXgYc8AROmcsn2Sg=; b=DJWo930wKRFOXNI8KFbGCJsH+1b0+/UknEEIPI819WeIyKRw1JxIqhwCxmuZB6BWWy U5cjSVUUaXTN5fzPA8FXddy3fHhx9ZUfgA1acz5ffnjYZPJ91olO21ftxayd0WLbOQDW BWB/nuN3OUZDv8YmE/MummsWti/CU+j/sfTJU= Received: by 10.216.131.155 with SMTP id m27mr5138436wei.19.1324168591260; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.73.65 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:10 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [94.7.241.176] In-Reply-To: <3182DA51-2772-4E38-8510-B86B0C1B8011@gmail.com> References: <-7621083024803974204@unknownmsgid> <1324142091.2048.16.camel@sybil-gnome> <004e01ccbd17$767b20a0$637161e0$@apache.org> <3182DA51-2772-4E38-8510-B86B0C1B8011@gmail.com> From: Ross Gardler Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:36:10 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 18 December 2011 00:08, Jean Weber wrote: > On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, "Allen Pulsifer" wrote: > >>> "The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified the >> first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release." >> >> I think I would prefer Apache OpenOffice v1.0 >> > > > That would totally confuse most of the current users of OOo, I think. --Jean I agree. I'm trying to make things clearer, not more confusing. If the first release actually ends up being something other than Version 3.4 then my piece will have a minor historical error. I think I can live with that. Ross -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com