Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com
 designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:24:42 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAKQbXgB0nd3rJ7dd663Rv=RLmsZ-PbWmCkF958KaGr5bFR2xXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Time for the ASF to send an Open Letter?
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@opendirective.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd97a5340da204b44cfed9

--0016e6dd97a5340da204b44cfed9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 17, 2011 5:09 PM, "Simon Phipps" <simon@webmink.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2011 4:13 PM, "Ross Gardler" <rgardler@opendirective.com>
wrote:
> >
> > It's not the relative adoption I want to show. If I did want that then
> > Michaels would indeed be a better document).
>
> What do you want to show? Maybe one of us can help by coming up with a
> suitable graphical representation that shows it without misrepresenting
> other facts?

I'm looking for something that shows diversity in the open document format
ecosystem.

I don't want to get into marking territory, comparing size, arguing over
who is better or more active or inactive or whatever. I want facts, nothing
more. Just an alphabetised list of all projects that consume and/or produce
ODF would be ideal.

Anything along those lines would be very much appreciated.

Ross

--0016e6dd97a5340da204b44cfed9--