Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-10328-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5873A7966
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:15:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 51103 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2011 23:15:42 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51054 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2011 23:15:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51046 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2011 23:15:42 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:15:42 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dave2wave@comcast.net
 designates 76.96.27.212 as permitted sender)
Received: from [76.96.27.212] (HELO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net)
 (76.96.27.212)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:15:31 +0000
Received: from omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.88])
	by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id 7zDo1i0041u4NiLAEzF21s; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:15:02 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([67.180.51.144])
	by omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id 7zbc1i00G36gVt78hzbdqr; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:35:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
From: Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksojfbedwjyoaO+2dRKHDB5aF9vzerPqze6SvJ8e6nAg0sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:15:06 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A2A9A10C-B684-47E7-871A-D569F33DE993@comcast.net>
References: <1322439624.71382.YahooMailClassic@web113503.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <4EE4B81A.7030502@openoffice.org>
 <11CF9C89-5984-43FC-A344-ED0B30A19621@comcast.net>
 <CAP-ksoj-Lv3hpHOTLQpAH6zFan9jaAS3SV9VWi8uXeYZroa1bw@mail.gmail.com>
 <A3AA9247-E744-4138-84C7-73212D3B491D@comcast.net>
 <CAP-ksogx0=SBRcc6k3=DP4oo1KtU4u9fnjTm=dqtVyoHe9qDow@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-ksoiwV6s1ecs4H+fBmPzOW1__vJFgL7eTQVF0msL_EtBBBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D63F859D-C2EE-4295-AD85-F692A391D3ED@comcast.net>
 <CAP-ksog2RHL+hiO15Du4gHNkzA3Yh+011miuwh3rm9u8O3DSCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <51E8516B-9473-4987-91FE-7CB2F6204F31@comcast.net>
 <CAP-ksojrT_asjA=51k7866WaUTktTioGxCm3Eo=TX9N6JP1edg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3964A6C7-CF99-4D30-B38A-9B41AC3043B3@comcast.net>
 <CAP-ksoiBef-gtT7WDVbJ2yMYfSLFo7v2V6uKdMzABTToDCZUmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <864D3EAD-5E14-4F20-A20F-3B66749969F2@comcast.net>
 <CAP-ksojfbedwjyoaO+2dRKHDB5aF9vzerPqze6SvJ8e6nAg0sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> =
wrote:
>=20
> <snip>
>=20
>>=20
>> I've already answered. I've been very clear. Nothing has stopped =
others from working on ooo-site.
>>=20
>=20
> I apologize if I was not clear.  I'm not interested in editing
> ooo-site.apache.org.

And I happen to think that this is absolute nonsense. ooo-site will be =
www.openoffice.org when the time comes. Waiting is a bogus excuse.

>  I'm interested in editing www.openoffice.org,
> the site that users actually visit.  I assume that is what most people
> want to edit.
>=20
> The fact that the PMC does not have the ability currently to update
> the website is a problem.  I realize that this is not a problem that
> you created.  I also know that you are trying to address this.  We all
> appreciate that.  But you are one person only, and you appear to be
> the bottleneck.  That is not a personal attack.  It is an observation.

I reject that I am a bottleneck. You only think I'm a bottleneck. I've =
provided documentation. Many others have edited ooo-site. Do you require =
a list of committers?

>=20
> If you think this work will take much more time (say more than 2 weeks
> more) then you would do us all a great favor and help the project
> immensely if you could write up a plan for the remaining work, break
> it down into remaining tasks, and ask for help with the remaining
> tasks, so we can move this forward faster.

I was planning on doing most of the work later today.

>=20
> And again, I'm looking for the minimum technical work needed to go
> live.  Updating the "why" page or the "contributor" page or any other
> existing content should not hold us back from going live.

Updating these pages does not need to wait. It doesn't matter and I'm =
not saying it is contingent. There is no reason to wait.


>=20
>> These incessant and accusatory emails are not encouraging me to =
finish.
>>=20
>=20
> I'm not accusing you of anything, David.  I'm encouraging you to
> release early and often and enable others to help. I hope that others
> on this project can have priorities that may differ from yours without
> you taking it as a personal attack.

You missed a number of hints. I asked to be left alone today to do the =
work. You never asked how much time was needed.

What do you think I meant by the situation might differ tomorrow?

Regards,
Dave


>=20
> -Rob