Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AD81919A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91842 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2011 01:24:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91774 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2011 01:24:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91766 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2011 01:24:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:24:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [141.146.126.227] (HELO acsinet15.oracle.com) (141.146.126.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:24:35 +0000 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pBR1OC2v026566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:24:13 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBR1OC4O003546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:24:12 GMT Received: from abhmt101.oracle.com (abhmt101.oracle.com [141.146.116.53]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pBR1OCRB006802 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:24:12 -0600 Received: from [192.168.1.70] (/99.105.56.42) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:24:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4EF91E3C.5070408@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:24:12 -0800 From: Andrew Rist User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Announce list is live References: <7D12646C-047D-4CB3-8065-D6359D0B4FD2@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.4EF91E3D.005A,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/26/2011 2:40 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Dave Fisher >> wrote: >>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>>> The list has been created: ooo-announce@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> You can subscribe by sending an email to: >>>> ooo-announce-subscribe@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>>> Posts from apache.org email addresses will be moderated. All other >>>> posts will be automatically rejected. >>>> >>>> We should promote this to the user lists and forums, as well as to >>>> users via social media. A blog post? >>> As a comment on the current Foundation post? >>> >> I meant a blog post on the availability of the announce list. (Surely >> if we had the announce list already we would have had a post on the >> start of the blog) >> >> Somehow we need to make people aware of the new list. The intended >> audience would be users who find the existing mailing lists too >> high-volume, It is good to have orthogonal ways of reaching out. If >> we just reach out to the existing lists we're missing the very users >> we're trying to reach. >> > Assuming we could, would it make sense to send an "announcement" about the > new list to the *old* *announce@openoffice.org? > > I think Marcus said messages to announce@openoffice.org were modesated by > ???? but maybe we could push something through. pen a message and I'll post it there. Andrew > > * > >> -Rob >> >>>> But it probably doesn't make sense to promote this until after the >> holidays. >>> Maybe promotion is a good question for ooo-marketing? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave > >