Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4EEBE728.2070905@akerbeltz.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:49:44 +0000
From: Michael Bauer <fios@akerbeltz.org>
Reply-To: fios@akerbeltz.org
Organization: Akerbeltz
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kazunari Hirano <khirano@gmail.com>
CC: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NL][Proposal] structure and process
References: <4EE89048.8040108@akerbeltz.org>
 <CAG6wa6GuVC243ZtCakvDVyp3+bhX0tD0v2_cZb6w4yeyVLvuwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAG6wa6GuVC243ZtCakvDVyp3+bhX0tD0v2_cZb6w4yeyVLvuwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Hirano,

Sorry for the late reply.

14/12/2011 12:54, sgrìobh Kazunari Hirano:
> I see. Why don't you propose "ooo-l10n@incubator.apache.org" ? if you 
> think it is not very good to use this list, 
> ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, as general l10n list. On such a list we 
> can discuss about how to use the pootle server, po files, gsi files, 
> translation deadline etc., right? That will be great. :) Thanks, khirano 
Well, at the current traffic, having fewer lists is probably ok. I was 
looking ahead for the time when there will be high volume lists for a 
range of topics, at which point I'd probably sign off the main dev list 
and on to l10 as that's my main concern.

Michael