Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02C4A7E36 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58883 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2011 07:43:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58699 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2011 07:43:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58691 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2011 07:43:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:43:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:42:56 +0000 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so1604308eaa.6 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:42:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5oHKAmeOJhcRXWQlE193GdHGcLgZyIGLD+fc/iwlUYs=; b=mIdtuT/Wf3wwNJuP16Ql8aAgX/1SP9BJ6V05SRYjxO2GVXRvMcMmaEx9DGM1fIGrh5 cKgAzTKshvDgF1OlJH61I4oj9MRsbTf6NaX9MLyaLe9EVxqQ+fE8KWa7Qn4gQBEOEVm5 hxzMiFrdYAjA5xL+2d9+c6bBvo1MP9WOA1AEw= Received: by 10.204.151.75 with SMTP id b11mr468647bkw.26.1323934955110; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [9.155.131.21] (deibp9eh1--blueice3n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p13sm12190301bkd.4.2011.12.14.23.42.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:42:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EE9A4E9.2050701@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:42:33 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2htaWR0?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: old colored vs new monochrome icons References: <1323875259.25054.YahooMailClassic@web113520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1323875259.25054.YahooMailClassic@web113520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/14/11 4:07 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > --- Mer 14/12/11, Gianluca Turconi ha scritto: > >> >> I agree as I've replied to Rob. >> >> Indeed, we already have a volunteer (Pedro) that wants to >> do the short term work. ;-) >> > > Really??? ;). > > I never meant to volunteer for anything but I did note > that reverting the Hg change was an easy solution: it > is and I can do it if that is the consensus. > > Right now I am actually playing with the new icons to > colorize them: the new icons are very well done and > colorizing them is not easy but I think it would be > worth it. :-) mmh the reason is that they were made by a professional designer (paid by Sun/Oracle) as all or most of the other icons in the office as well. A resource that is not longer available :-( Juergen