Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15E087AC9 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93207 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2011 22:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93143 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2011 22:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93135 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2011 22:48:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of filhocf@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:48:20 +0000 Received: by yhoo47 with SMTP id o47so809717yho.6 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:47:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ByTwLBl7iNiB/y24UQUc0vguOak/0JuEUPxjRRAbfmg=; b=bVGKpuEYFPCj7u+MTDkoM5DFR21aYabhs+ssOErkQBVfre4Fw7gOxhufFH0188gx8Z Hf6vVUPaNB43OHzF9PU6cRKiw+ECbG8A5JfeNbHRT0Ya4UyHXr7g9z+ApRBeO0oCKE0C EKdi6nGBgm672n8hDfWXS/9ELXxKQqOSoXkSo= Received: by 10.236.178.33 with SMTP id e21mr7064055yhm.4.1323816479749; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:47:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (201-67-34-26.bsace703.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br. [201.67.34.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1319069anz.14.2011.12.13.14.47.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:47:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EE7D617.9020402@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:47:51 -0200 From: Claudio F Filho User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About the Former Native Language projects References: <4EE60A21.109@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi On 12-12-2011 13:53, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Claudio F Filho wrote: >> I think that more that the license issue, we have a lot of people >> unhappy with the way that LibO is following, the same people that was >> part of NL and chose in go to LibO believing in a thing and finding >> other, so, i think that really have people interested in help here, but >> with this posture of Apache are lost, without idea where help. Maybe is >> time to consider better this position and find a place for this work's >> force. > > Hi Claudio, what do you mean by "this posture of Apache"? I hope > there is a simple misunderstanding we can clear up. This is a general vision of many people, and i can talk about the old brazilian volunteers, that are following this list. And more, after a campaign here, in Brazil, about the lack of code's participation, was widespread the idea of "is better don't help". Out of this second topic, that is a local problem, we saw this "code's profile" as preference and without a place for other things. Now, with Louis bringing this questions for discussion, i believe that can be a mistake/misunderstand from us. And this thread clarifys for other people that could have the same vision. Best regards, Claudio