Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE7F69CE8 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92814 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 01:52:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92764 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 01:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92756 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2011 01:52:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:52:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.229.54] (HELO nm32-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.229.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:52:04 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.55] by nm32.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Dec 2011 01:51:43 -0000 Received: from [98.138.87.12] by tm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Dec 2011 01:51:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1012.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Dec 2011 01:51:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 972284.63161.bm@omp1012.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 64705 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Dec 2011 01:51:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1324432302; bh=87DAHKF8h6FSske0+w3RARD/wu5XwnU3gSaGx5UT3Ks=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rbUa7bVG90puPfYAMLQ9Sgx/yJIpj3ecxOhnQD3dRIEg/Pec9cRfHZ1xcQo/mJcHuCFIRIv/YRg6xKi8nPZW8w4PSUWKXb6faRmX2XZMa6V6NYry/EMLKP/bbDhaey6R0wuWThI5kXPbS9J5z/w9yJFIZA7seeiU1p/gwlwNBUY= X-YMail-OSG: Z0wO0fgVM1kiBKFzGgiZybuNW4ShSck157sw1dfUcvEGqq5 _P1KmeryZa1MOYh4ZqbosV40d8Vs6pgtBfLm.8_UAk3vOU5MqdM_.HmlwZc7 fnoDCPfi7wSovyse0K6G9Iyf1FfK4HQKXAJb1KLKHq2FWjVLRBrTJWgvMzSu kO3PrJFYN.5P6dTidEwA3ObTqdsJ._655KrPQWTeHwZBkK7BwwjTTi9qrvKm NECCy7USpBehSnr8KClHmjsxrIGPSY9DBJQPbMUJRn_mbUisP.q2_fbqhUdk SuW8nxwM3G0PlUJMfLIeNI9iK3TvSFlPHrkJ6peQ6TaHx.w0EKIs88k7Ovse V03OuhRXudeNyI0M9vRPIo._WnQqkZhWzmoODvPgSOHETlFXJ8Vj0LqXGLas _ERXfdbbrxVfKyRJUFw0jrZX0DNoReTejZjps2DIVsLtNnj9K10_MSYDPsrA 6PzCgfw4rDfeM2t2FKEX.hYJjowdJWXIgazkVZB.EOT4SI.BELdV8AXHz6Hx ez01Z5ZW.zidffaU_73BSIkidPWcS8.iES7pT.VPTCDkjTTu3yCKhb2spkfa 9ZxQrEVUlzadnBNoMT18OZUIsoiZ9_h0ve20FrqfR9IOQDA-- Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113511.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:51:42 PST X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 Message-ID: <1324432302.61931.YahooMailClassic@web113511.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:51:42 -0800 (PST) From: Pedro Giffuni Reply-To: pfg@apache.org Subject: Re: Calling TOO members re pootle data (was Re: Calling Martin, Stefan Matthias re the OOo pootle data) To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FWIW,=0A=0AMartin Hollmichel did write to this list and mentioned he had=0A= the box with the Pootle data available. This was before we=0Ahad a running = Pootle (Sorry that I am too lazy to look in=0Athe archives ;).=0A=0ALet's b= e patient, I am sure they will get to it.=0A=0Acheers,=0A=0APedro.=0A=0A---= Mar 20/12/11, Ross Gardler ha scritto:=0A...= =0A> Since the TeamOO people have reached=0A> out to us I wonder if we can = get=0A> some comment on the status of the pootle data that we=0A> understan= d was=0A> on a machine managed by TeamOO (see below)=0A> =0A> On 17 Decembe= r 2011 01:54, Ross Gardler =0A> wrote:=0A> > On= 16 December 2011 17:10, Andrew Rist =0A> wrote:=0A= > >=0A> > ...=0A> >=0A> >> The server that=0A> >> http://pootle.services.op= enoffice.org was=0A> hosted on was paid for by funds=0A> >> from TOO (anecd= otal, but I have no reason to=0A> question that). =A0TOO has=0A> >> retaine= d physical custody of that server. =A0I have=0A> inquired about the data on= =0A> >> the server and have gotten no response. =A0I have=0A> no interest i= n trying to=0A> >> determine who is entitled to the server itself,=0A> but = the data is another=0A> >> issue. =A0I believe the data belongs to the=0A> = project, and is something Apache=0A> >> OpenOffice is entitled to.=0A> >>= =0A> >> Martin, Stefan, Matthias - Can you help us=0A> retrieve this inform= ation for the=0A> >> project?=0A> >=0A> > ping?=0A> >=0A> > Ross=0A> =0A> = =0A> =0A> -- =0A> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)=0A> Programme Leader (Open Devel= opment)=0A> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com=0A>