Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F252A07F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21187 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2011 16:10:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21070 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2011 16:10:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21057 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2011 16:10:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:10:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.135.221.2] (HELO nat.nue.novell.com) (195.135.221.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:10:04 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (mmeeks.gotadsl.co.uk [213.208.123.138]) by nat.nue.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:09:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1324310993.5975.141.camel@linux-yjtf.site> Subject: Re: Time for the ASF to send an Open Letter? From: Michael Meeks Reply-To: michael.meeks@suse.com To: pfg@apache.org Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:09:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1324305161.40287.YahooMailClassic@web113520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <1324305161.40287.YahooMailClassic@web113520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Organization: Novell, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Hi Pedro, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 06:32 -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > I'd prefer to see myself as part of the freedom loving, >> non-corporate dominated group of hackers having fun. > > And that's fine because you are not me. I am real engineer > (Mechanical) BTW ;). I find your jokes somewhat hard to parse; I wonder whether this quip, juxtaposed with you as 'navy' and me as 'pirate' is intended to read as a qualitative comparison of the relative depth of our experience, professionalism, or product quality. I would build my defense of that, not on my MEng (Cantab) but on my decade of mistakes in the world of Free Software ;-) [ and still learning ]. > And you still have more to do: surprisingly AOO is at this time > the only GPL-compatible OpenOffice codebase. (OK, I haven't > looked if Neooffice removed the GPL-incompatible code but ... > who cares about them). Looks like a nasty nucleus of potential FUD. If you are aware of some licensing problem, please send a reasonably detailed notification to some official contact point; info@documentfoundation.org might be good for that. > > That in no sense means we will be 'based on Apache > > OpenOffice Incubating' - we will not be. > > There is no way around that. So you appear to think :-) the work is not yet started; no doubt you'll enjoy the result. All the best, Michael. -- michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot