Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 363B37BC6 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7100 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2011 19:26:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7053 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2011 19:26:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7045 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2011 19:26:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:26:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org designates 75.98.160.130 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.98.160.130] (HELO a2s15.a2hosting.com) (75.98.160.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:26:12 +0000 Received: from 63-226-210-225.tukw.qwest.net ([63.226.210.225] helo=Astraendo) by a2s15.a2hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbztH-0005j0-6D for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:25:51 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: References: <1324112320.9857.ezmlm@incubator.apache.org> <4EEC8784.501@akerbeltz.org> In-Reply-To: <4EEC8784.501@akerbeltz.org> Subject: RE: How many languages will Apache OpenOffice support? Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:25:58 -0800 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <012a01ccbcf1$b514a0f0$1f3de2d0$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGO1a7KjGhOY9ZJGsblBw5COYKYpQKherOHlkcjA/A= Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s15.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org Michael, I think the language selections are for writing aids, not UI and Help = internationalization. You might want several even though your UI is = English, for example. =20 If you look at the OOo-dev 3.4 beta release, you'll see that there is = only a full release (with Java JRE too, I suppose, on Windows) for = English. This will be an English UI plus writing aids for a few flavors = each of en, fr, and one for es. All other languages, including any UI = internationalization, are via langpacks, one per listed language. The = langpack adds a UI language and embedded help internationalizations, as = available, and whatever writing aids there are for that language, also = as available. For the supplemental Italian langpack install that I did as an = experiment, when I select the UI language to be Italian, the embedded = help switches to Italian also. The enumeration is here: . I notice that LibreOffice 3.4 install for Windows-en includes the = writing aids for just over 30 native languages. (Sometimes variants are = in separate sets, sometimes multiple variants are in the same aid = folder.) The embedded help is a separate helppack download and install. = It's true that the installed extensions take almost 200MB when = extracted into the file system, including non-writing-aid extensions = that are included in the install. =20 This does not answer your question about where the bar is on UI = internationalization, but it should make clear what a langpack can = provide. =20 One factor in packaging has to do with the size of full installs on = Windows and a desire to minimize the number of them. I have no insight = into that. There are many variables that factor into it. It is = undoubtedly not a one-size-fits-all, but having the volunteers to create = and verify many variations is an additional factor. It might be a = reasonable downstream business though. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Michael Bauer [mailto:fios@akerbeltz.org]=20 Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 04:14 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: How many languages will Apache OpenOffice support? [ ... ] Sorry if the questions is naive but can you define a langpack language?=20 I never took part at that level with OOO. Are those languages without=20 localized Help? Just a question (and i have no answer) but more and more = software I get doesn't use in-product Help but refers you to a Wiki etc. = Might it not make sense to consider making in-product Help optional and=20 referring to a Help website for the most part? Secondly, a more sensible, slimline install would certainly sound sense=20 to me. It's been a while since I did the install but if I recall=20 correctly, you actually download the English install with all the=20 langpacks and then have to manually pick your language. Which is=20 bonkers. If I've selected Tamil as my language of choice, then I don't=20 need my bandwidth cluttered up with the other 50 languages. I should=20 *only* get Tamil, with no further messing about. The full pack only=20 makes sense if you're installing more than one language at the same = time. That to me would be the two most obvious ways of saving space and=20 bandwidth, so > - Move help and other things into a separate download file. - Reduce=20 > the doubled data and libraries in the package files. - Improve the=20 > installer to download langpacks that the user wants. - etc. Amen to all of these! Michael