From ooo-dev-return-11029-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Dec 22 10:25:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4DF7977C for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57379 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2011 10:25:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57317 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2011 10:25:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57309 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2011 10:25:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:25:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:25:28 +0000 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so7432172eaa.6 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:25:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UFerkXJcgZaU5aoVZaQ36Blx6MGhntryylhcnlTKLf8=; b=hOMzLgDM3t9hJkcjJBVnXwj96zgS61olRPHMYCaG1HSPPwUx2zSKboIamMjjDcfxCA i14DtUIfunZUnPGr+Ij3ARPkq9nlNGq2X5Va3tdvHlCnMbSmLXCRU5Q7FOFU3wyoOurq Y99KGQlPxYHa+QNx9/n3EG6FAOFS6mFl4uKXg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.125.10 with SMTP id gq10mr2957264bkc.11.1324549507485; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:25:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.50.208 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:25:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111222082357.GA4554@localhost> References: <00a101ccbb94$2db5e0f0$8921a2d0$@acm.org> <00fc01ccbba9$4033b760$c09b2620$@apache.org> <018001ccbc50$b9faaac0$2df00040$@acm.org> <01e701ccbc54$8e202d90$aa6088b0$@acm.org> <4EEC657E.2030102@wtnet.de> <1324519260.12970.7.camel@sybil-gnome> <20111222082357.GA4554@localhost> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:25:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: old colored vs new monochrome icons From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen_Schmidt?= To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0b5b4e1920404b4abb64f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0ce0b5b4e1920404b4abb64f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Am Donnerstag, 22. Dezember 2011 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile < arielch@apache.org>: > Hi Drew, all, > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:01:00PM -0500, drew wrote: >> Howdy folks, >> >> A little late - but, I did manage to put a few hours into adding color >> to the ODF icons found on the odftoolkit site[1]. >> >> To be honest at the moment I am not satisfied with these, though I >> wanted to put a teaser up for the moment: >> http://lo-portal.us/aoo/example-icons.png >> >> I will find another hour or two tonight and put the actual files I'm >> working on to the wiki. >> >> However, I have to say that after doing a little of this and looking at >> the other options the option of roling the file icons back to the 3.0 >> set of files is making more sense. > > I think you are right. Changing only this icons will not be enough, the > old SO icons and the MSO icons have to be changed too. > Besides, adding color to the new icons does not solve the problem in the > file pickers (icons are too small, and adding color won't help to > distinguish file types). > > So I'd propose to revert the icons to the old colored ones. > It's basically reverting > http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340/rev/b2b4215e6f9b > > In http://people.apache.org/~arielch/images/old-color-icons/ > you can find a patch, and a tar with the old and monochrome icons. > There will be some work to do, because some icons are missing, and the > patch did not change the templates/extensions icons in the start center, > for example; so a little research is needed (and testing, of course). > > > If none objects, we can commit these in 48 hours, and start fixing this > (instead of reinventing the wheel and creating new ones, or painting the > current icons). > +1 Juergen > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina > --000e0ce0b5b4e1920404b4abb64f--