incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andor E <eymux2...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [AOO 3.4 Test Plan Discussion]Overview
Date Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:47:17 GMT
I'll ask tomorrow at our regular meeting with the project lead.

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:41 AM, xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/12/8, Andor E <eymux2009@googlemail.com>:
>> Hi,
>> I almost missed your mail. When I got no response to my offer, I
>> thought there was no interest.
>
> Sorry, I was catched by some urgent things those days after I post the
> AOO 3.4 test plan topic to community and missed your mail..
>
>> Our testers use TestLink (http://www.teamst.org/), so the test cases
>> currently live inside that. From the manual it seems, that one can
>> only export to XML. Which format would you prefer?
> XML format sounds fine for me.
>
>> Other than that, I still need to ask for permission to share the test
>> cases. It would help, if I could demonstrate serious interest by the
>> community to put the tests to good use.
> Yes, now we have had several QA vulunteers have strong passion to
> contribute their effort to AOO 3.4 and further AOO testing. One big
> challenge for us is the most test assets, especially manual test
> cases, are not migrated from old OO site to Apache OO site. This will
> bring high risk to regression testing and to the AOO quality
> assurance. Thanks advance if your team can share it.
>
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Andor Ertsey
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:54 AM, xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Andor,
>>>
>>> It will be much appreciated if you can share it with free license. And we
>>> can see if some volunters can contribute to the translation.
>>>
>>> Hope your response. Thanks.
>>> 2011/11/24 Andor E <eymux2009@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> for our project we have a sizeable amount of manual test cases for
>>>> OpenOffice.org (created by professional test engineers). These are
>>>> used for internal and user tests before a release. If there's a
>>>> serious interest in it, I might be able to arrange a release of these
>>>> test cases under a free license (creative commons?). They are written
>>>> in German, though, and would need to be translated first.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings
>>>>
>>>> Andor Ertsey
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:58 AM, xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> >> Hi all,
>>>> >> I think it's time for use to discuss and detail AOO 3.4 test plan
now.
>>>> >> Basically at current time I suggest:
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi Lily, Thanks for the proposal.
>>>> >
>>>> >>   1. Leverage OpenOffice users on General Usage test
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > For this to work we need:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1) Test cases that are clear and easy to understand
>>>> >
>>>> > 2) Test cases that can be run without requiring a  lot of preparation
>>>> >
>>>> > 3) Test cases that can be run without dedicating much time.  How can
>>>> > someone help who has only 1 hour to contribute?
>>>> >
>>>> > 4) Test cases that can be run without learning a lot of other tools
or
>>>> processes
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >>   2. Focus on establishing automation mechanism. Start from Build
>>>> >>   Verification Testing(BVT in short).
>>>> >
>>>> > Is the the same as a "smoke test"?
>>>> >
>>>> >>   3. Focus on test infrastructure set up. Start from case management
>>>> tool.
>>>> >>   For 3.4, place the test cases on wiki and volunteer can do general
>>>> testing
>>>> >>   against. If volunteer couldn't write cases, may give the test
scope
>>>> >> he
>>>> >>   would do. For example, which component etc. And then report defects
>>>> >> in
>>>> >>   Apache Bugzilla.
>>>> >
>>>> > Maybe we also need a "guide to writing test cases"?  Or point to
>>>> > something that already exists for the project.
>>>> >
>>>> >>   4. Focus on Performance Verification Testing(PVT in short)
>>>> >>   investigation, and setup benchmark PVT environment.
>>>> >
>>>> > OK.
>>>> >
>>>> >>   5. Establish QA entry in AOO wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/
>>>> >
>>>> > OK.
>>>> >
>>>> >>   6. Build private build before official build is ready
>>>> >
>>>> > OK.
>>>> >
>>>> >>   7. Platform will be covered
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   - Windows XP
>>>> >>   - Win7 32bit/64bit
>>>> >>   - Where we only have a 32bit windows version, it should run against
>>>> >>   62bit windows version.
>>>> >>   - Redhat 6 32 bit/64 bit
>>>> >>   - Ubuntu 10.04 32 bit/64 bit
>>>> >>   - Mac 10.7
>>>> >>   - Mac 10.6.x
>>>> >>   - FreeBSD 9.0/8.2 (9.0 is suppose to release at 12/07/2011?)
>>>> >>   - OS2
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > For platforms, maybe we think about them like this:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1) In order to preserve the value of the OpenOffice brand among users
>>>> > and our reputation for high quality, we will have an official Apache
>>>> > binary release only on platforms that have successfully completed the
>>>> > QA plan that we all agree on.
>>>> >
>>>> > 2) Volunteers, based on their interests, will determine which
>>>> > platforms are officially supported in releases.
>>>> >
>>>> > 3) Platforms that do not have enough volunteers to complete the test
>>>> > plan would not have official Apache releases.  Or if we had releases,
>>>> > they would be called "experimental" or some other name to indicate
>>>> > that they were not fully tested.
>>>> >
>>>> > 4) Of course, anyone is welcome to take our official source releases
>>>> > and make a build on another platform and distribute it.  But these
>>>> > would not be official Apache releases.
>>>> >
>>>> > -Rob
>>>> >
>>>> >> Welcome your comments.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message