incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <>
Subject Re: Early User-QA Engagement (was RE: Ip Clearance: 1st version of Svg replacement available)
Date Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:56:31 GMT
Am 12/26/2011 10:33 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
> So what does "version58 mean?"  Where did that come from?

This is the default value when you create new issues. Maybe an BZ admin 
could change this to "OOo 3.3"?

> If it is fixed in another build, how is that identified?

And if she/he is already working on it, please create a new item like 
"AOO 3.4" or similar. "OOo 3.4 Beta" is out of the game and - with the 
new nightly and dev builds - we need now a new version entry in that list.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: TJ Frazier []
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 13:11
> To:
> Subject: Re: Early User-QA Engagement (was RE: Ip Clearance: 1st version of Svg replacement
> On 12/26/2011 15:06, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> I think that is a good idea with regard to a lot of feature adjustments, and especially
the SVG one.  It would be useful to blog or wiki both a view of how it is brought along and
a view of how folks can participate in confirming the operation of features and other changes
in these early technology builds.
>> Are bug reports going to be accepted against nightlies and technology/developer builds
that are now being made available to those who know where to find them?  There are the builds
that Ariel has made and there are the builds that Raphael makes available as well.
>> If so, how will they be identified?  One suggestion is to use the latest SVN update
number applicable to the working copy when the build was made.  That seems like a simple enough
procedure.  There are recommendations for additional details (such as a build date), but anything
that gets us a non-decreasing unique identifier between builds will work.
> [ ... ]
> Hi, Dennis,
> For a peek at how the devs are JFDI, see:

View raw message