incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shane Curcuru <>
Subject Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
Date Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:53:31 GMT
On 2011-12-17 12:00 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 17 December 2011 16:57, Donald Harbison<>  wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Ross Gardler
>> <>wrote:
>>> A further, related question (I'm working on a blog piece) would we say
>>> "Apache OpenOffice (incubating) plans to release a reference
>>> implementation of the suite in ...", or is some other
>>> phrasing preferred?
>>> What's your definition of a reference build? Would an official Apache
>> release of OpenOffice 3.4 meet that definition?
> That's a good question and I think is probably what I'm asking ;-)
> I'm a little confused as to what brand the release will push, Apache
> OpenOffice or

The PPMC voted a while back to call their product "Apache OpenOffice". 
I would expect the primary branding will be updated to reflect that in 
various places, including the main icons.

I strongly urge the PPMC to consider continuing the OOo version numbers 
- 3.4 or 3.5 or the like.  While many of us, as software engineers, have 
a detailed understanding of release number nuances, the vast majority of 
the rest of humanity does not have a clue.  They'll expect - presuming 
we're showing them that we're the obvious "next" release of an product to install - to see something in the 3.x line.

The most important thing that I see Ross asking for is our best 
projection at the big picture; the very basic bits of the marketing 
message.  That's what needs to be told to the world.  The rest is just 
details for the podling committers to continue to work out.  (Obviously, 
immensely important and hard details!  But still - mostly just details 
that the vast majority of humanity will never care about.)

- Shane

View raw message