incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: old colored vs new monochrome icons
Date Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:32:15 GMT
Am 12/14/2011 11:30 AM, schrieb Gianluca Turconi:
> Il giorno Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:49:52 +0100
> "Marcus (OOo)"<marcus.mail@wtnet.de>  ha scritto:
>
>> So, a +1 to keep the currenty design but to send them simply to a
>> paint shop. ;-)
>
> +1 for me too.
>
> AFAIK, nobody ever complained about design but many people screamed out
> loud for the missing color schema.
>
>> So, you think that a big hint like "3.4 will be with the old b/w
>> icons but we will do everything to give you back the long-wished
>> colored icons with the next but one release [3.5 or 4.0]" is not good
>> enough and the people cannot wait for the next but one release?
>
> The monochrome icons are around since more than 1 year. IMO, the change
> for a colored icon set is coming one year too late. ;-)

OK, it was just a question and no attempt to prevent a change already in 
AOO 3.4. When it's necessary, then it's necessary.

>>> P.S. to whom is interested, the most wanted future by the usenet
>>> Italian community (IMO) is font inclusion in OO Writer documents. It
>>> caused flame wars, endless legal discussions starting
>>> from Agfa vs. Adobe trial and a huge addition to my kill file. :-P
>>
>> Do you really mean ODF file or maybe PDF files? I remember
>> discussions to include the fonts also into PDF files that also let to
>> legal discussions.
>
> Yes, there were discussion for PDF too, but many other users wanted to
> include them in ODF files "like Microsoft does in Office files" (BTW,
> AFAIK again and if I'm not wrong, Mictosoft can embed fonts in office
> documents because pays royalties to AGFA.)

Of course, with money you can solve all (OK, 99%) of all problems. 
That's no magic. ;-)

Marcus


Mime
View raw message