incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <>
Subject RE: old colored vs new monochrome icons
Date Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:46:19 GMT
Oh.  Never mind the screen shots.  The ooo-dev list apparently does not accept 
*.png attachments.  I sent them.  They did not arrive.

 - Dennis

(I did not realize that OOo 3.3.0 was installing those icons because a 
different application had set my associations first.  Then the OOo 3.3.0-it 
install replaced them and so I saw those ODF-tagged ones were actually being 
distributed.  I didn't realize that.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis E. Hamilton []
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 16:41
To: ''
Subject: RE: old colored vs new monochrome icons

I have no objection to the coloring of the icons.

I object to the use of an "ODF" tag on them with no indication that these are
for implementation-specific file associations.  I also failed to include the
illustrative image from my last note.  I will correct that.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Weir []
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 16:30
Subject: Re: old colored vs new monochrome icons

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<> wrote:
> Rob,
> As far as I am concerned, unless those icons are issued by the OASIS ODF
> Adoption TC, in a way that they are usable with anyone's ODF-supporting file
> associations, that discussion doesn't count.  (If the OASIS ODF Adoption TC
> did something like that, that would be cool and consistent with the notion
> of making ODF support visible.)

Honestly, I have no idea what you're talking about at this point.

Do you have any objections with the proposal that has been made about
coloring the icons?  Or do you have a different set of icons that you
want to counter-propose with?


View raw message