incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
Subject RE: [odfauthors-discuss] Chapter 1 of the Base Guide ready for publication
Date Sat, 03 Dec 2011 03:53:38 GMT
Then the disposition of LEGAL-96 is moot and there is no need to pay further 
attention to it as far as documents from ODFAuthors go.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 09:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [odfauthors-discuss] Chapter 1 of the Base Guide ready for 
publication

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:
> [ODFAuthors subscriber hat on]
>
> My understanding of the current state of LEGAL-96, 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-96> is that a concrete case is 
> required.  I don't see one here unless the Apache OpenOffice project 
> proposes to change the terms of use for the Wiki to say that all new 
> contributions must be under category-A licenses.
>

Actually, so there is no uncertainty, that is exactly my proposal,
that all new contributions to the wiki are under Apache 2.0 license.

However, no objections to linking to non-ALv2 content hosted on other websites

-Rob

[ ... ]

Mime
View raw message