Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51A567932 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 23:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39841 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2011 23:18:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39800 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2011 23:18:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39792 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2011 23:18:15 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:18:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:18:14 +0000 Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so1750928vwe.6 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:18:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.185.137 with SMTP id fc9mr189667vdc.100.1320362293610; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.118.81 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:18:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1320172479.26916.YahooMailClassic@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <034101cc98ce$d87430c0$895c9240$@apache.org> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:18:13 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wr= ote: >> Rob speaketh, >> >> =C2=A0 ... let's admit that almost all of the 500,000 openoffice.org >> =C2=A0 addresses are unused or were created by spammers and have zero >> =C2=A0 relevancy to the project. >> >> So, what is "almost all" of 500,000, and how can it be determined? =C2= =A0How many >> are left? >> > > If you run a report on the BZ instance you see only 8700 or so unique > ID's have ever been used for submitting defects. =C2=A0So 83% of the > 500,000 ID's are irrelevant from the perspective of BZ. =C2=A0Maybe the > remaining 420,000 users are furiously editing the wiki, but somehow I > doubt that as well. > It was reported off list that my calculation was in error. I lost a digit some place. 8746 accounts have submitted issues in Bugzilla. So given the claimed 500,000 openoffice.org email addresses that have been assigned, that means that 99.99% of them are not involved in reporting defects in BZ. I know that the figure 99.99% sounds like hyperbole, but do the math yourself. > We could narrow that down further by those who are reporters on issues > that are still open and get a more manageable number that could be > send a notification that the openoffice.org mail forwarder is going > away, with instructions on how to reset their email. > > In any case, let's stop with the hysteria of the 500,000 accounts. > That has no basis in reality. =C2=A0Not even LibreOffice is claiming that > many project participants. > >> It would be more interesting to know how many forwards are happening via >> @openoffice.org over recent times, yes? >> > > The number of forwards is irrelevant from the perspective of the > project. =C2=A0ASF is not in the business of forwarding emails. =C2=A0Wha= t is > relevant is our ability to communicate with people who have submitted > defect reports. =C2=A0 I think there are far easier ways of accomplishing > this, provided we act diligently and start notifying users that the > forwarding accounts are going away. =C2=A0Remember, the openoffice.org > email address aliases are public. =C2=A0Anyone can create a report of suc= h > user accounts in BZ and send them a note. =C2=A0So no data protection > issues are involved in notifying them that the service is going away. > > -Rob > >> Do you have that information? =C2=A0Can it be obtained? >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 12:13 >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addres= ses >> >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> --- On Tue, 11/1/11, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Questions for the BZ, Forums and MWiki. Is there a way for >>>> people registered in those systems with an @OOo email to >>>> change their address without losing their content? >>>> >>> >>> I won't miss what I never had, but ... >>> >>> For BZ it's easy to change the email address. Just go to >>> Preferences --> Account information. >>> >> >> So is there any way to solve a more constrained problem? =C2=A0In other >> words, let's admit that almost all of the 500,000 openoffice.org >> addresses are unused or were created by spammers and have zero >> relevancy to the project. >> >> Instead, we could look at all new BZ issues created in the last year, >> all forum and wiki members who have logged in in the last year, and >> all ooo-* list members. =C2=A0From those lists, get the list of all thos= e >> with openoffice.org addresses. =C2=A0Send them a note saying that the >> forwarding service is going away. =C2=A0Tell them how to reset their ema= il >> address in the tools. =C2=A0On top of that put a prominent notice on the >> wiki, forums and website to catch any users we might have missed. >> >> -Rob >> >> >>> cheers, >>> >>> Pedro. >>> >> >