Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99A4A74C8 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21786 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2011 19:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21740 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2011 19:36:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21732 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2011 19:36:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:36:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of acolorado@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:36:53 +0000 Received: by wyg8 with SMTP id 8so3147659wyg.6 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:36:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CKY3lqmsWOsxU3vjDghTW+STO5Kz53NwmdabDexaOkM=; b=UGrlmcOXgoHIU4dYalbRUt2ePuEF899ms5DemW8NqczZkT+lbFLFQkM3gEs3P0FYc1 wmUvVmzM6zD0aQ8Od4Eoqe/1d692uzeltHHw9ZoyEOcRp/XxY4KC8LPnpLrGo6/qX/8N gcTJEuifKqTArwV9QlRUQhSHSFonbbyqmjucM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.75.204 with SMTP id e12mr31662469wiw.61.1321385791750; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:36:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: acolorado@gmail.com Received: by 10.180.24.161 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:36:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <75F9A728-6688-4A22-A635-3DA2C0827D1A@jaguNET.com> References: <75F9A728-6688-4A22-A635-3DA2C0827D1A@jaguNET.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:36:31 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vV6hmi5Tj41gIM7Iynz_Uf6SLvg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Time for the ASF to send an Open Letter? From: Alexandro Colorado To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable is always a good idea to have a constant message with the public. also from a recruiting point of view. i would suggest to highlight the trully openness of the project and also the engineering tasks that we are aiming. i think the community has also grown and is time to start communicate its character. On 11/15/11, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I have been mulling this over for a long time... > > Up to now, we have been reactionary. We have allowed others to > control and distort the message, paint things as a "us vs. them" > battle (simply to position themselves for personal gain in the > whole debacle), and foster FUD to the clear harm of the ENTIRE > OOo ecosystem. > > I think it's time that an Open Letter to the entire Open Office > ecosystem (companies, entities, individuals, etc...) be drafted > that sets the record straight. > > And I volunteer to drive this task... > > Comments? > --=20 Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Espa=C3=B1ol http://es.openoffice.org