Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47400968E for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39903 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2011 17:07:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39850 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2011 17:07:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39842 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2011 17:07:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:07:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:07:29 +0000 Received: by faar15 with SMTP id r15so341329faa.6 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:07:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lWo1Uq572LwXO4ia9i0FKBnuzKwp3IuryWDMssuNkyY=; b=iI7Pwq/Rhpy5Y79WdNXgljA9USnNiHPfr2ea3DyAT2UVWYBw5GmHqCpB4rtMQ3Dwns cFqlscWKdTRZJ7EYyIA/3dRhOrJYcTpguTBEKaaEQzLELv3Mj540pacN85jlo2KzJgVg DSl6+L+17vL4D4PfllhVZH1oew/neoxVJ/UZo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.127.142 with SMTP id ha14mr45404946bkc.116.1322500027881; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:07:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.128.140 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:07:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <2F0A9A5E-AFB7-4899-8070-276CBAF7A4E8@comcast.net> <5CC3DE16-F0A8-4556-B250-4386F7EF2508@comcast.net> <007a01ccad3f$3f0440d0$bd0cc270$@acm.org> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:07:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [WWW][Policy] Participate! - Rewriting contributing.openoffice.org From: Kay Schenk To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0cdbc609b3104b2ce88c8 --000e0ce0cdbc609b3104b2ce88c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello again-- OK, based on this discussion (really meta redirects in the header would be most useful in my opinion), I will NOT be changing the "participate" link on the now ooo-site home page until the discussion on this is finalized. Or is it for this one aspect? I'm somewhat confused about the approaches here. And yes, we do indeed to redirect the entire "contribute.openoffice.org" to something just as we'll need to do for ALL the projects sites. On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > >> > >> On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Redirects are easy once the live-site is our site and it can be > figured out how to add HTML meta tags that the Apache CMS allows. > Also, there is always the good old .htaccess scripting of a redirect > (again, working around the CMS I suppose). > >>>>> > >>>>> It should be done on at least on ooo-site even if it has no effect > until cut-over. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is no reason to break a link on speculation when it is easy to > avoid breaking it, or having the break be temporary until cut-over. (I'd > bet the page has been search-indexed and the "your download is starting, > thank you for downloading" pages link to donation/contribution points.) > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Dennis, I have absolutely no objections to any redirect rules that you > >>>> are volunteering to implement. I, however, do not think they are > >>>> worth while, so I will not be spending any time on them. > >>>> > >>> > >>> And something else to consider: without actual data your chances of > >>> guessing what are the significant incoming links are is practically > >>> nil. Since we have not enabled Google Analytics on the site, we > >>> continue to lack such data. > >>> > >>> Some of the external links are to the kind of content we are already > >>> throwing out. > >>> > >>> For example: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html points to > >>> http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/sissl_license.html > >>> > >>> It is entirely irrelevant to our work at Apache, but do we keep it for > >>> historical reasons? > >>> > >>> If we're not willing to enable GA, then our next best bet would be to > >>> monitor the httpd logs for 404 errors. A regular report of page not > >>> found errors, sorted by URL and indicating the referrer, will give us > >>> a targeted list of places were a redirect will help. Otherwise we're > >>> not going to have much luck with the **2.6 million** external links > >>> that come into openoffice.org pages. > >> > >> The plan is to redirect with wildcards to specific pages. See my other > email. > >> > >> I am thinking we will do that type of redirect to most of the legacy > openoffice.org site. It might make sense to ask Apache Infra for a third > Apache CMS tree called ooo-archive and move all of the legacy that is > either hopelessly out of date, currently without a people to support it, or > irrelevant to OOo under Apache. > >> > >> I want to be careful about this as a balancing act of displacing users > will need to be considered. Each page that is a target of a redirect will > need to be carefully edited to allow that most people arriving at that page > will feel lost. They won't be getting what they expect and it might not be > in their native language. > >> > > > > How will you know if you are doing this well or poorly? If, due to a > > typographical error on a redirect rule, how would you know if you > > "lost" 10,000 pages? That's my concern. We're trying to migrate > > content with 2.6 million external links to it based on eyeballing a > > list of redirects. That might get you 90% of the way there. But 10% > > is still a lot of errors. > > I'm pretty good at doing the eyeballs - I've got four of them with > progressive lenses - and I think we will have less than 300 rules. I will > put all the redirects on the CWiki page I started. I am sure we will have > other eyeballs like Joe's and everyone looking at Infrastructure commits. > > You've also made some useful suggestions about scanning and testing for > broken internal links. This is actually a greater concern to me. IIRC you > suggested listing all the hrefs, sorting for duplicates and then testing > each. > > > Maybe you can get Infra@ to archive http logs for the week before and > > the week after the migration? > > Sure Infra can help us look for 404s from the first week after, but I > don't know how the week before would help - the logs are at Oracle and > different stuff will be broken. > > To address your concern we should look specifically at what a 404 error > page should look like and how to address this. > > Go to qa.openoffice.org and you will see trouble with how bugzilla was > migrated without the qa project in front of it. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > > -Rob > > > >> Regards, > >> Dave > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> -Rob > >>>> > >>>>> Finally, it is my understanding that cut-over of the static site is > now at our option and the AOOo has reasonable discretion with regard to > timing. It seems that cut-over can be done as soon as ooo-site is ready > enough to be the new live site. And the subdomains don't all have to cut > over together and everything will still work. A progressive, rolling > cut-over might even be in the cards. > >>>>> > >>>>> - Dennis > >>>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org] > >>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 10:11 > >>>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>>> Subject: Re: [WWW][Policy] Participate! - Rewriting > contributing.openoffice.org > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Kay Schenk > wrote: > >>>>>> [ ... ] > >>>>> > >>>>>> How about if we don't hear any major objections by say, Dec. 1, > I'll go > >>>>>> ahead and make this change (redirect contributing/index.html to > this). > >>>>>> Nothing is in concrete, we can always go back or do something else. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know if we need to do an actual HTTP-level redirect. I > >>>>> don't think there are many external links to the OOo contributing > >>>>> page. It would be sufficient if we just change the link to point to > >>>>> the project contributing page. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> MzK > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged > >>>>>> by the way its animals are treated." > >>>>>> -- Mohandas Gandhi > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." -- Mohandas Gandhi --000e0ce0cdbc609b3104b2ce88c8--