Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C2889DBA for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47114 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2011 19:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47071 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2011 19:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47063 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2011 19:48:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:48:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luispo@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:48:41 +0000 Received: by wyh5 with SMTP id 5so3371857wyh.6 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:48:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7V1ZrZZ4wXxANFf54ee6/CMMii8rTdnO8Wi74U0EEcc=; b=NvLgyOzdSeH/XtuXkR2q0EzjX9XfoQYhSsVj6ywGDwVAA+qpDH/UeF5HcIj9G3mFKw DtOObZ6yn7fiw8NZrcOWLSDUdLsz4nU5nzUwcvhLaZRexIqXQqqO1X4XWf5vgPt3F2ts ZCGgE76EbZn/cGx6LB2xRxEf0UCW8oHDVlo70= Received: by 10.227.206.143 with SMTP id fu15mr5474162wbb.16.1320954501067; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:48:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: luispo@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.156.202 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:48:00 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Louis_Su=C3=A1rez=2DPotts?= Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:48:00 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4C4LReYMCL_KP8XMvu4W41SSDww Message-ID: Subject: OOo Business... To: "ooo-dev@incubator" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I continue (naturally) to receive many requests from businesses (small and large) to use the trademarked "OpenOffice.org" logo. I generally pass on these, as there seemed, until very recently, a mystery on how to proceed. I'm still in need of enlightenment, and would appreciate some guidance. * I think it's pointless to endorse "OpenOffice.org" at this point. The probable name of its successor will be "Apache OpenOffice" or some variant thereof. And that new name will come into play very soon indeed. We will need to progressively inform all those using the old logo/name/trademark to switch over with new installation sets. * I would therefore like to be able to respond to those requesting use of the trademark, etc., to wait a little bit, and then to return to us=E2=80=94preferably to a wiki or even better, an automated service, such = as we used on OOo, for this. (The automated service allowed us to docket requests and act more expeditiously, while also giving room for more fully understanding the request. Otherwise, the requests were simply sent to a list I set up for this and which John, Florian, and I managed for several years, though it really seems like an eternity=E2=80=94= and John was doing much of the work.) =E2=80=94 I also receive many (well, a few) requests and inquiries about contributing to OpenOffice.org code. (Rob has been included in one such.) Right now, it's a little easier to tell people what to do=E2=80=94jo= in Apache's lists for OOo in the Incubator, participate, contribute. But not all requests are quite so simple. For instance, what about templates? Extensions? I have no problem with telling people to join the lists where the contributions are, and to proceed according to the Apache way (tao of apache?) but perhaps there are other answers I should give? (Oh, and I have no problem whatsoever with others taking on this role. I've just been doing it as an extension of my previous existence modulo OOo, not as an assertion of nonexistent authority.) Thanks louis