Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65FA993A9 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79983 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2011 12:20:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79940 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2011 12:20:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19792 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2011 04:55:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-Originating-IP: 125.168.106.134 Message-ID: <4EBB5937.7040306@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:55:19 +1100 From: Dave Barton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]+[VOTE] Trademark and Branding References: <1320898466.66885.YahooMailClassic@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 X-Stationery: 0.7.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------- Original Message -------- From: Danese Cooper To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:30:29 -0800 > I must admit to wondering who "we" are in your statements, Donald. > > D See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-marketing/ Dave > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Hello; >> >> An important question. The vote is for choosing the >> product name, can the project name be different? >> >> To make this clear: I would think it practical to >> keep option (a) for the product, but option (b) >> for the project. >> >> Just wondering if there will be a second vote for >> the project name. >> >> regards, >> >> Pedro. >> >> --- On Wed, 11/9/11, Donald Harbison wrote: >> >>> We've had a lengthy discussion on >>> ooo-marketing regarding trademark and >>> branding considerations and options. It's time we moved >>> forward and made a >>> decision in order to expedite the ongoing migration of the >>> web site and to >>> remove one more obstacle from the dev team. >>> >>> We want to preserve and protect the historic OpenOffice.org >>> trademark. The >>> choice of an Apache name and new trademark will not impact >>> the historic >>> mark as granted to the Apache Software Foundation for >>> stewardship. >>> >>> Since this is a major decision we felt it important to >>> bring it back to >>> ooo-dev for final discussion then vote. We have the choices >>> presented on >>> the wiki[1] for your reference. >>> >>> [1]https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** >>> Branding+Planning< >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Branding+Planning> >>> >> >